Is the word "a'azab" correct in the language?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : A'azab.
The questioner : In "a'azab." I once mentioned to you that in a hadith, a Companion said: "I was in the mosque of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and I was a'azab"?
The Shaykh : By Allah, may you be well, this hadith is in al-Bukhari.
The questioner : Ah, so you refuted that statement.
The student : What is this?
Another student: Shaykh, refute the claim of those who object to the words "a'azab" and "a'azab" by saying that this is correct according to the Shari'ah text.Musannaf Abd al-Razzaq 11:27. Then he saidThe Shaykh .
Another student: In al-Bukhari?
Another student: Ah, in al-Bukhari.
Another student: This is a gift, may Allah reward you with good, and the hadith is authentic. Come here, Abu Malik.
The Shaykh : Regarding "a'azab" and "a'azab," I can mention, and our brother here, Abu 'Abdullah, may Allah reward him with good, will mention, that there is a hadith in "Sahih al-Bukhari" from Ibn 'Umar that he used to spend the night in the mosque while he was a'azab.
The student : And he was a'azab.
Another student: And he was a'azab.
The Shaykh : Perhaps you should review this in "Sahih al-Bukhari."
The student : It is permissible, but our Shaykh, in the language, "a'azab" is never said.
The Shaykh : No problem, because the language of the hadith is a language.
The student : If this is established.
The Shaykh : This is the intended meaning.
The student : But I say that I have traced the language and found that the word "a'azab" is incorrect, and that it is on the pattern of "faras" (horse) and its plural is "a'azab."
The Shaykh : This—may Allah bless you—does not negate the other, as you know, the language is very broad. This is from one aspect, and from another aspect, you know that the scholars of grammar disagreed: can a letter of the language be established by a hadith? This is a matter of disagreement. However, the stronger position according to Ibn 'Aqil and others is that the hadith is a proof, and any letter of the Arabic language is narrated from the Arabs just as the hadith is narrated from the master of Arabs and non-Arabs. Therefore, this is self-evident. If it is established in "Sahih al-Bukhari"... then this is a language.
The student : Do you have "Sahih al-Bukhari"?
Another student: I have "Fath al-Bari," what chapter?
The Shaykh : Right now, we are.
The student : The chapter of Mosques. And bring the dictionary, for the sake of Allah.
Another student: Which dictionary? Lisan al-'Arab?
The student : Ah, bring the first volume, the letter Ba.
The Shaykh : The language has spared us the trouble, the language, may Allah bless you...
The student : No problem, the tracing, the chapter of Mosques.
Another student: It is allowed at the beginning of the chapter.
The questioner : In "a'azab." I once mentioned to you that in a hadith, a Companion said: "I was in the mosque of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and I was a'azab"?
The Shaykh : By Allah, may you be well, this hadith is in al-Bukhari.
The questioner : Ah, so you refuted that statement.
The student : What is this?
Another student: Shaykh, refute the claim of those who object to the words "a'azab" and "a'azab" by saying that this is correct according to the Shari'ah text.
I used to sleep in the mosque of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and I was a'azab
كنت أنام في مسجد الرسول - صلى الله عليه وسلم - وأنا أعزبAnother student: In al-Bukhari?
Another student: Ah, in al-Bukhari.
Another student: This is a gift, may Allah reward you with good, and the hadith is authentic. Come here, Abu Malik.
The Shaykh : Regarding "a'azab" and "a'azab," I can mention, and our brother here, Abu 'Abdullah, may Allah reward him with good, will mention, that there is a hadith in "Sahih al-Bukhari" from Ibn 'Umar that he used to spend the night in the mosque while he was a'azab.
The student : And he was a'azab.
Another student: And he was a'azab.
The Shaykh : Perhaps you should review this in "Sahih al-Bukhari."
The student : It is permissible, but our Shaykh, in the language, "a'azab" is never said.
The Shaykh : No problem, because the language of the hadith is a language.
The student : If this is established.
The Shaykh : This is the intended meaning.
The student : But I say that I have traced the language and found that the word "a'azab" is incorrect, and that it is on the pattern of "faras" (horse) and its plural is "a'azab."
The Shaykh : This—may Allah bless you—does not negate the other, as you know, the language is very broad. This is from one aspect, and from another aspect, you know that the scholars of grammar disagreed: can a letter of the language be established by a hadith? This is a matter of disagreement. However, the stronger position according to Ibn 'Aqil and others is that the hadith is a proof, and any letter of the Arabic language is narrated from the Arabs just as the hadith is narrated from the master of Arabs and non-Arabs. Therefore, this is self-evident. If it is established in "Sahih al-Bukhari"... then this is a language.
The student : Do you have "Sahih al-Bukhari"?
Another student: I have "Fath al-Bari," what chapter?
The Shaykh : Right now, we are.
The student : The chapter of Mosques. And bring the dictionary, for the sake of Allah.
Another student: Which dictionary? Lisan al-'Arab?
The student : Ah, bring the first volume, the letter Ba.
The Shaykh : The language has spared us the trouble, the language, may Allah bless you...
The student : No problem, the tracing, the chapter of Mosques.
Another student: It is allowed at the beginning of the chapter.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.