Discussion of the rule (mistake and forgetfulness are excused for my Ummah) in acts of worship

The Shaykh : Now, deriving the ruling for this incident according to the legal principles, based on the rule taken from his saying (peace and blessings be upon him): , the second incident falls under this Prophetic rule: . There is no doubt that this rule has branches; some of these branches align with it, while others differ from it. What aligns with it is what is known: if a fasting person eats or drinks while forgetting, then Allah has fed him and given him drink, and he owes no making up of the fast and no expiation. So this falls under the generality of the previous hadith: to the end. But in other cases, if a person forgets, he is required not to count the act of worship that occurred during that forgetfulness. So if an incident occurs for which there is no specific text regarding it, and it has a connection to mistake and forgetfulness or coercion, this hadith is applied. If something comes regarding the incident indicating that it is excluded from the rule, it is excluded. And if, on the contrary, something comes confirming its inclusion in the rule, as is our case? That is clearer and better. So your hadith falls under the generality of his saying (peace and blessings be upon him): , and the story of Abu Hurayrah has no problem because it!

The questioner : aligns.

The Shaykh : aligns as it is, another issue.

The questioner : And for a period, hey, a short time period.

The Shaykh : In any case, it is the period; it is not hidden from you whether it was long or short, it is not important.

The questioner : Of course, but my intention is this period that enters, and the rest!

The Shaykh: Yes, that is so.