You mentioned the hadith of Abu Ya'la regarding the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) marrying Safiyyah (may Allah be pleased with her)
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : You mentioned the hadith of Abu Ya'la regarding the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) marrying Safiyyah and the wedding feast, and you had said in it: "So the wedding feast is for three days after the consummation"; meaning we understood from this "after the consummation"; that is: after the first three days of consummation, and you cited as evidence the narration of Abu Ya'la.
The Shaykh : Pardon me, did you understand this?
The questioner : We understood the wedding feast to be three days after the consummation.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And in Abu Ya'la's narration, there are two chains: the chain of Hammad al-Tawil, with his concealment of a defect in the chain (which is well known), which says: "The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) returned from Khaybar, and when he was between Madinah and Khaybar, he married Safiyyah, so he stayed with her for three days and they held a wedding feast , and in the second narration: from the narration of Abu Ja'far al-Razi, and he said - after he said: - he said:
The Shaykh : Abu Ja'far has poor memory.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : So he is not cited as evidence when he is the sole narrator; how much less so when he contradicts; so where is the problem?
The questioner : Meaning, you take the narration of Hammad?
The Shaykh : Hammad, yes.
The questioner : Even though he is one who conceals defects in the chain?
The Shaykh : The important thing is, from whom is the concealment? From whom does Hammad narrate the hadith?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, like this, do you remember this?
The questioner: Yes ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, so they mentioned that if Hammad narrates from Anas, and if he did not hear it from him, then he only heard it from Thabit; so in that case, it is the same whether he mentioned Thabit between him and Anas or omitted mentioning him; so both are the same; because his concealment of defects is limited to narrating from Anas, and between them is Thabit al-Bunani.
Other than that?
The Shaykh : Pardon me, did you understand this?
The questioner : We understood the wedding feast to be three days after the consummation.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And in Abu Ya'la's narration, there are two chains: the chain of Hammad al-Tawil, with his concealment of a defect in the chain (which is well known), which says: "The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) returned from Khaybar, and when he was between Madinah and Khaybar, he married Safiyyah, so he stayed with her for three days and they held a wedding feast , and in the second narration: from the narration of Abu Ja'far al-Razi, and he said - after he said:
He married Safiyyah.
تزوج بصفيةAnd he made the wedding feast for three days.
وجعل الوليمة ثلاثة أيامThe Shaykh : Abu Ja'far has poor memory.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : So he is not cited as evidence when he is the sole narrator; how much less so when he contradicts; so where is the problem?
The questioner : Meaning, you take the narration of Hammad?
The Shaykh : Hammad, yes.
The questioner : Even though he is one who conceals defects in the chain?
The Shaykh : The important thing is, from whom is the concealment? From whom does Hammad narrate the hadith?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, like this, do you remember this?
The questioner: Yes ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, so they mentioned that if Hammad narrates from Anas, and if he did not hear it from him, then he only heard it from Thabit; so in that case, it is the same whether he mentioned Thabit between him and Anas or omitted mentioning him; so both are the same; because his concealment of defects is limited to narrating from Anas, and between them is Thabit al-Bunani.
Other than that?
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.