The Shaykh was asked about a commentary found in "Mukhtasar al-'Ulu"; is it his or is it by "Zuhayr al-Shawish"?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : In "Mukhtasar al-'Uluw," you stated that there are three indicators of metaphor that necessitate departing from the literal meaning:
- The rational, such as His saying - the Exalted:[Yusuf 12:82] meaning: their people were with them, and from this: [Al-Isra 17:24].
- The second: the superlative, such as:[Ghafir 40:36] meaning: order the one who builds, because such a person is known not to build.
- The third: such as: for it is evidence that Allah is not the light. The scholars said: And the sign of a false call is its being devoid of any of these indicators, so look to see the truth upon creation ... , is this annotation yours or ... ?
The Shaykh: You must know before anything else that ... the incident occurred between me and them years ago.
Another questioner: O Allah ... .
The Shaykh : O Allah, amen.
The Shaykh: And therefore he annotates my books without my permission, with what his knowledge suggests to him, and perhaps it is better to say his ignorance. This annotation is from him and not from me, and I do not approve of this speech.
The questioner: ... and is it from you ... ?
The Shaykh: No, no, it is not from me. I said in answer to this question that it is not from me, and I do not approve of this speech.
The questioner: This is what I preferred for the brothers, if they objected, so I said: Then I know that ... adds things from himself ... .
The Shaykh: One of the most dangerous additions is that he came to the hadith:Sahih al-Bukhari 6147, the hadith is in "al-Sahihayn," and it is mentioned in "Sahih al-Jami'." So the man - may Allah guide him - added to this first part the second part: "And every pleasure is inevitably transient."
The questioner : In the main text, Shaykh?
The Shaykh: It is in the text, the details come to you, and he placed it in brackets like this in the text itself, and wrote an annotation like this annotation, saying: Quoted from "Diwan Labid," page such-and-such.
The questioner : ... the hadith.
The Shaykh: And as is usually the case, as I saw here in this book, when he places ... he attributes it to himself, either by implication or explicitly. Implication is "Zay," explicit is "Zuhayr." In this commentary, Zuhayr has not written anything; he has not placed anything. In a second commentary here in the same book, it is Zuhayr, ... it goes back to "Sahih al-Jami'" - also - Zuhayr or "Zay" has not placed anything. This is in the new edition. The one who reads this commentary says this is the work of Al-Albani because he is the author, but the truth is that this addition is from him. And so he has corrupted many of my books with his commentaries. And this addition is very serious; because the errors accumulated with this single addition. First, the greatest and most dangerous of them is lying against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), because the hadith in all the books of the Sunnah, not only in al-Bukhari and Muslim, all the books of the Sunnah have the hadith restricted to the first half of the verse, "Ala kullu shay'in ma khalla Allaha batil," so he came and lied against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and he placed the second half to complete the first half. Then he lied against al-Bukhari and Muslim, and everyone who narrated this hadith, because they did not narrate it! And the hadith is mentioned in "al-Jami'" attributed to so-and-so and so-and-so and so-and-so from the compilers, and they do not have this addition. Then he lied against the author of "al-Jami' al-Saghir," who is al-Suyuti, then he lied against the arranger of "al-Jami' al-Saghir," and the one who added the addition to it isThe Shaykh : Yusuf al-Nabhani, and then I was the last one he lied about, - peace and mercy and blessings of Allah be upon you - , so we ask Allah to guide us.
The questioner: And the narrators of the hadiths - also - O Shaykh?
The Shaykh: Correct, but the book apparently does not mention anyone other than these people, yes, that is right.
- The rational, such as His saying - the Exalted:
And ask the city in which we were and the caravan in which we came
وسئل القرية التي كنا فيها والعير التي أقبلنا فيهاAnd lower to them the wing of humility
واخفض لهما جناح الذل- The second: the superlative, such as:
O Haman, construct for me a tower
يا هامان ابن لي صرحًا- The third: such as:
The parable of His light
مَثَلُ نورهThe Shaykh: You must know before anything else that ... the incident occurred between me and them years ago.
Another questioner: O Allah ... .
The Shaykh : O Allah, amen.
The Shaykh: And therefore he annotates my books without my permission, with what his knowledge suggests to him, and perhaps it is better to say his ignorance. This annotation is from him and not from me, and I do not approve of this speech.
The questioner: ... and is it from you ... ?
The Shaykh: No, no, it is not from me. I said in answer to this question that it is not from me, and I do not approve of this speech.
The questioner: This is what I preferred for the brothers, if they objected, so I said: Then I know that ... adds things from himself ... .
The Shaykh: One of the most dangerous additions is that he came to the hadith:
The most true words said by a poet were the words of Labid. He said, i.e. 'Verily, everything except Allah is perishable
أصدق كلمة قالها الشاعر كلمة لبيد : ألا كل شيء ما خلا الله باطلThe questioner : In the main text, Shaykh?
The Shaykh: It is in the text, the details come to you, and he placed it in brackets like this in the text itself, and wrote an annotation like this annotation, saying: Quoted from "Diwan Labid," page such-and-such.
The questioner : ... the hadith.
The Shaykh: And as is usually the case, as I saw here in this book, when he places ... he attributes it to himself, either by implication or explicitly. Implication is "Zay," explicit is "Zuhayr." In this commentary, Zuhayr has not written anything; he has not placed anything. In a second commentary here in the same book, it is Zuhayr, ... it goes back to "Sahih al-Jami'" - also - Zuhayr or "Zay" has not placed anything. This is in the new edition. The one who reads this commentary says this is the work of Al-Albani because he is the author, but the truth is that this addition is from him. And so he has corrupted many of my books with his commentaries. And this addition is very serious; because the errors accumulated with this single addition. First, the greatest and most dangerous of them is lying against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), because the hadith in all the books of the Sunnah, not only in al-Bukhari and Muslim, all the books of the Sunnah have the hadith restricted to the first half of the verse, "Ala kullu shay'in ma khalla Allaha batil," so he came and lied against the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), and he placed the second half to complete the first half. Then he lied against al-Bukhari and Muslim, and everyone who narrated this hadith, because they did not narrate it! And the hadith is mentioned in "al-Jami'" attributed to so-and-so and so-and-so and so-and-so from the compilers, and they do not have this addition. Then he lied against the author of "al-Jami' al-Saghir," who is al-Suyuti, then he lied against the arranger of "al-Jami' al-Saghir," and the one who added the addition to it isThe Shaykh : Yusuf al-Nabhani, and then I was the last one he lied about, - peace and mercy and blessings of Allah be upon you - , so we ask Allah to guide us.
The questioner: And the narrators of the hadiths - also - O Shaykh?
The Shaykh: Correct, but the book apparently does not mention anyone other than these people, yes, that is right.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.