An interjection from one of the attendees regarding the story of the Ghuraniq and his mention of two treatises on the subject of the story in "Aref Hukmat Library."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : You mentioned here that you have a treatise on the story of the Ghuraniq...
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner : And have you come across the two treatises that were previously answered on this topic? And there is...
The Shaykh : No, by Allah.
The questioner : Yes?
The Shaykh : No, I have never heard of them, nor have I come across them.
The questioner : I came across two different treatises in "Aref Hukmat Library"... one of them... that the Ghuraniq is about the story of the Ghuraniq... but merely because you came across this treatise directly, I said... I said it might be the Shaykh's treatise, and what Ibn Hajar means... and when he brought me a collection, and this collection... is of varying sizes, and among the collections are two treatises on this topic with this title... but when I saw this, I was astonished, so I said: Then I will search for the Shaykh's treatise as well and bring it, and compare it with the treatise, yes, and indeed I searched for it and found it as well, and if I had not found it, I would have taken another treatise, and I said to someone next to me: Read the Shaykh's treatise to me.
Huh?
The Shaykh : You will find a discrepancy between the two treatises.
The questioner : That is it, that is the point, meaning... and he read, and I found between the two treatises... the person who wrote this treatise did not leave the Shaykh... but your way is... and he himself did not come across it in this treatise... the result is that he did not mention in it, meaning, anything of the discussion... I mentioned it, this is the first one, then I said to him: Let us take the second one... he read the first one, so I took the second one as well, and I found the second one... from it; because it is a better expression of the first one, its style is good even if it is a text, but the second one is neither theoretical nor artificial, but rather consists of compiled speech... on the topic, yes, so from here I... your speech, so I knew that the method of the three treatises is extremely distant; therefore I asked you: Did...? And what I benefited from this review is that there are those who wrote on this topic in the past, even if they did not present the topic as it deserves... and this, yes, is confirmed by the common proverb: How much did the first leave for the last!
The Shaykh : That is it.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : I did not understand your question, what is your question?
The questioner : ... .
...
The Shaykh : ... people from the speech... the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said.
Another questioner : That is it.
The Shaykh: Yes.
Other than that?
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner : And have you come across the two treatises that were previously answered on this topic? And there is...
The Shaykh : No, by Allah.
The questioner : Yes?
The Shaykh : No, I have never heard of them, nor have I come across them.
The questioner : I came across two different treatises in "Aref Hukmat Library"... one of them... that the Ghuraniq is about the story of the Ghuraniq... but merely because you came across this treatise directly, I said... I said it might be the Shaykh's treatise, and what Ibn Hajar means... and when he brought me a collection, and this collection... is of varying sizes, and among the collections are two treatises on this topic with this title... but when I saw this, I was astonished, so I said: Then I will search for the Shaykh's treatise as well and bring it, and compare it with the treatise, yes, and indeed I searched for it and found it as well, and if I had not found it, I would have taken another treatise, and I said to someone next to me: Read the Shaykh's treatise to me.
Huh?
The Shaykh : You will find a discrepancy between the two treatises.
The questioner : That is it, that is the point, meaning... and he read, and I found between the two treatises... the person who wrote this treatise did not leave the Shaykh... but your way is... and he himself did not come across it in this treatise... the result is that he did not mention in it, meaning, anything of the discussion... I mentioned it, this is the first one, then I said to him: Let us take the second one... he read the first one, so I took the second one as well, and I found the second one... from it; because it is a better expression of the first one, its style is good even if it is a text, but the second one is neither theoretical nor artificial, but rather consists of compiled speech... on the topic, yes, so from here I... your speech, so I knew that the method of the three treatises is extremely distant; therefore I asked you: Did...? And what I benefited from this review is that there are those who wrote on this topic in the past, even if they did not present the topic as it deserves... and this, yes, is confirmed by the common proverb: How much did the first leave for the last!
The Shaykh : That is it.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : I did not understand your question, what is your question?
The questioner : ... .
...
The Shaykh : ... people from the speech... the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said.
Another questioner : That is it.
The Shaykh: Yes.
Other than that?
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.