What is the ruling on isbal (letting a garment hang below the ankles) in trousers?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Shaykh, if the trousers hang down from the socks to below the ankles, and the socks go up higher, do we apply the ruling of the trousers as being isbal (letting a garment hang below the ankles)?
The Shaykh : I understood your question, but I did not know the point, from the middle of the socks -he laughs-
Another questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : But in this case, it is not possible for the trousers to hang down to the ankles.
The questioner : They hang down, but they go up, covering them; the sock covers them from top to bottom.
The Shaykh : I know, but in this case, the trousers do not hang down to the ankles, and your companion is right in front of you.
Another questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : ... except in a very strange case, where the wearer of the trousers intends to contradict the hadith, otherwise it is not possible, because when the trousers try to come up, the sock is above them, so the trousers must go up, whether the wearer likes it or not, and ask an expert about it.
The questioner : He secures it, Shaykh, he secures it to the bottom so that he feels warmth on the ankles.
The Shaykh : Warmth on the ankles, Allah is the Greatest, in any case, no, let us stop and look into it, even if it is an imagination for us. As I said earlier, I do not imagine the trousers or the cuffs of the trousers remaining below the ankles while they are under the socks. I do not imagine this, but if a person does not intend that, then there is no doubt that he falls under the severe warning.
The questioner : Shaykh, regarding what is called the overalls or what is it called? The "kailon" (overalls), meaning a sock and trousers attached together as one, this is the image, meaning what is the ruling on this form of clothing, a trouser and a sock?
The Shaykh : I say this has a second ruling, because this is not a trouser, it is not a trouser, it is neither a trouser nor a sarong nor anything that can be included in the general text. This is from one aspect, and from another aspect, this is in reality not the clothing of Muslims, because this is usually worn by many women who intend to wear something tight and fitted. And of course, for small children, this is possible, but that is for memorization and the like. As for adults, it is only part of the forbidden imitation of the disbelievers in the Shari'ah.
The questioner : It is not worn.
The Shaykh : From this aspect only. Yes.
The questioner : If one intends imitation in it ... ?
The Shaykh : Imitation occurs even if one does not intend imitation, yes, otherwise.
The Shaykh : I understood your question, but I did not know the point, from the middle of the socks -he laughs-
Another questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : But in this case, it is not possible for the trousers to hang down to the ankles.
The questioner : They hang down, but they go up, covering them; the sock covers them from top to bottom.
The Shaykh : I know, but in this case, the trousers do not hang down to the ankles, and your companion is right in front of you.
Another questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : ... except in a very strange case, where the wearer of the trousers intends to contradict the hadith, otherwise it is not possible, because when the trousers try to come up, the sock is above them, so the trousers must go up, whether the wearer likes it or not, and ask an expert about it.
The questioner : He secures it, Shaykh, he secures it to the bottom so that he feels warmth on the ankles.
The Shaykh : Warmth on the ankles, Allah is the Greatest, in any case, no, let us stop and look into it, even if it is an imagination for us. As I said earlier, I do not imagine the trousers or the cuffs of the trousers remaining below the ankles while they are under the socks. I do not imagine this, but if a person does not intend that, then there is no doubt that he falls under the severe warning.
The questioner : Shaykh, regarding what is called the overalls or what is it called? The "kailon" (overalls), meaning a sock and trousers attached together as one, this is the image, meaning what is the ruling on this form of clothing, a trouser and a sock?
The Shaykh : I say this has a second ruling, because this is not a trouser, it is not a trouser, it is neither a trouser nor a sarong nor anything that can be included in the general text. This is from one aspect, and from another aspect, this is in reality not the clothing of Muslims, because this is usually worn by many women who intend to wear something tight and fitted. And of course, for small children, this is possible, but that is for memorization and the like. As for adults, it is only part of the forbidden imitation of the disbelievers in the Shari'ah.
The questioner : It is not worn.
The Shaykh : From this aspect only. Yes.
The questioner : If one intends imitation in it ... ?
The Shaykh : Imitation occurs even if one does not intend imitation, yes, otherwise.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.