Reading and Annotation: And by Allah, the scholars said nothing but what you said with them without concealment, and by Allah, the errors of the scholars are more [important] to you than the Infallible
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"And by Allah, the scholars said nothing but what you said with them without concealment".
The Shaykh : ... .
The reader: "And by Allah, the errors of the scholars are to you *** the very truth and the requirement of proof
And so you have judged".
The Shaykh : Read...
The reader: I read the first verse
The Shaykh : Well, in any case, we did not explain it because there is a contradiction between them
"And by Allah, the errors of the scholars are more [important] to you than the Infallible with proof"
This is what we say. We say that the errors, yes, we see
"And by Allah, the errors of the scholars are more [important] to you than the Infallible with proof"
Meaning that the errors of the scholars, even if they are errors, are more [important] to you than the statement of the Infallible with proof. So you prioritize the statements of the scholars and make them, even if they are errors, more [important] than the statement of the Infallible with proof. The second version
"And by Allah, the statements of the scholars are not errors to you, but rather" what? "the very truth and the requirement of proof", meaning the requirement of evidence. So which is more severe? That they make the errors of the scholars more [important] than the statement of the Infallible, or that they make the errors of the scholars correct? The first is more [important]. The first is more [important]. Yes.
"And by Allah, the scholars said nothing but what you said with them without concealment".
The Shaykh : ... .
The reader: "And by Allah, the errors of the scholars are to you *** the very truth and the requirement of proof
And so you have judged".
The Shaykh : Read...
The reader: I read the first verse
The Shaykh : Well, in any case, we did not explain it because there is a contradiction between them
"And by Allah, the errors of the scholars are more [important] to you than the Infallible with proof"
This is what we say. We say that the errors, yes, we see
"And by Allah, the errors of the scholars are more [important] to you than the Infallible with proof"
Meaning that the errors of the scholars, even if they are errors, are more [important] to you than the statement of the Infallible with proof. So you prioritize the statements of the scholars and make them, even if they are errors, more [important] than the statement of the Infallible with proof. The second version
"And by Allah, the statements of the scholars are not errors to you, but rather" what? "the very truth and the requirement of proof", meaning the requirement of evidence. So which is more severe? That they make the errors of the scholars more [important] than the statement of the Infallible, or that they make the errors of the scholars correct? The first is more [important]. The first is more [important]. Yes.