(Explanation of the danger of rejecting the texts and that it is blindness) So marvel at the blindness of those with insight who saw*** that the one who follows without knowledge is the possessor of proof, and considered him*** more deserving of following than others
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : He said: "So marvel at the blindness of those with insight who saw*** that the one who follows without knowledge is the possessor of proof,
and considered him*** more deserving of following than others, without any insight or proof"
It is correct to marvel at how they knew that the one they follow is the possessor of proof, while they left and did not know that Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) is the possessor of proof. If a hadith comes from the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), it is not considered proof because it is possible [to doubt it], but if the sayings of their sheikhs come, the sayings of their sheikhs, then those are the proof.
"And they were blind to the two revelations because they did not understand*** their meaning, marvel at the one with two deprivations"
We ask Allah for safety. "And they were blind to the two revelations because they did not understand*** their meaning" This is among the punishment of Allah (Glorified and Exalted is He) for one who is biased toward his desire and leaves the Book and the Sunnah, as Allah the Exalted said:[Al-An'am 6:110] Therefore, you must be cautious when evidence passes by you so that you do not attempt to oppose it. Say, "We have heard and we obey," because if you attempt to oppose it, you may be deprived of guidance in the future.
"The sayings of the sheikhs are more complete in explanation than the*** two revelations" According to whom? According to these people, the sayings of the sheikhs are more complete in explanation than the two revelations. Ibn al-Qayyim said: "No, not the One, the Most Merciful", meaning that the sayings of the sheikhs are what? They are not more complete in explanation than the two revelations. He said: "No, not the One, the Most Merciful".
and considered him*** more deserving of following than others, without any insight or proof"
It is correct to marvel at how they knew that the one they follow is the possessor of proof, while they left and did not know that Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) is the possessor of proof. If a hadith comes from the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him), it is not considered proof because it is possible [to doubt it], but if the sayings of their sheikhs come, the sayings of their sheikhs, then those are the proof.
"And they were blind to the two revelations because they did not understand*** their meaning, marvel at the one with two deprivations"
We ask Allah for safety. "And they were blind to the two revelations because they did not understand*** their meaning" This is among the punishment of Allah (Glorified and Exalted is He) for one who is biased toward his desire and leaves the Book and the Sunnah, as Allah the Exalted said:
And We will turn away their hearts and their eyes just as they refused to believe in it the first time. And We will leave them in their transgression, wandering blindly.
ونُقلب أفئدتهم وأبصارهم كما لم يؤمنوا به أول مرة ونذرُهم في طغيانهم يعمهون"The sayings of the sheikhs are more complete in explanation than the*** two revelations" According to whom? According to these people, the sayings of the sheikhs are more complete in explanation than the two revelations. Ibn al-Qayyim said: "No, not the One, the Most Merciful", meaning that the sayings of the sheikhs are what? They are not more complete in explanation than the two revelations. He said: "No, not the One, the Most Merciful".