Discussion of the Tahrir Party.

The Shaykh : If a discussion like this one, if I may use the expression, a discussion between the Messenger and 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, were to take place between the Hanafi imam and one of his followers, where the follower would say to him, "O Imam, why do we shorten the prayer when we are praying behind you? And you say that the implication of the opposite is not considered?" He would not be able to answer; he would have to correct his ideas, just as I corrected mine. He would have to say, "The implication of the opposite is a proof, unless it contradicts the explicit text." What is the explicit text here? "A charity that Allah has bestowed upon you, so accept His charity." This means that this was a condition, and then Allah the Exalted lifted it. So, if the implication of the opposite conflicts with the explicit text, it has no value. Now, this verse, like the other verses, conflicts with the explicit commands: "Enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong" The Tahrir Party brought this hadith and brought the details in a very short time, meaning very recently. Therefore, the group, after their imam and leader passed away, became scattered, with each group speaking from whatever knowledge they have. And perhaps the most accurate thing to say is that they are speaking from whatever ignorance they have. And Allah is the One to help.
Al-Halabi : My Shaykh, one of the brothers told me that he read with his own eyes in one of the books ofThe Shaykh : Taqi (may Allah have mercy on him and forgive him), and the brother promised me to bring the book. It says that anyone who spreads a creed based on a report from a single narrator should be imprisoned for three months under the Islamic state.

The Shaykh : On the narrator's guarantee, but I do not think he will bring it to you, if Allah wills.
Al-Halabi : The brother seems to be trustworthy, and he said the book is with him.

The Shaykh : If Allah wills, he will bring it to you.
Al-Halabi : This is also perfect good opinion, my Shaykh.

The Shaykh : Yes, that is right.
Al-Halabi : May Allah reward you with good.
Al-Halali: They, my professor, mean that they turn "what is not permissible" into "what is not obligatory" as a philosophy. They say, "We say it is permissible for you to believe, but it is not permissible for you to hold the belief, and it is not obligatory for you to hold the belief." They distinguish between affirming and holding the belief.

The Shaykh : We know this, but does this distinction agree with the Qur'an?
Al-Halali: No, it contradicts the Qur'an.

The Shaykh : If they were under the rain, they became under the gutter.

The questioner : Because I have a lesson today, the session will not be long, but...

The Shaykh : May Allah benefit you, and welcome.