(The reality of tahrif is substitution) He sought to change the meanings, for they are the *** intended by the expression of every tongue, so he came to them while they were prominent from the *** words
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"He sought to change the meanings", which is tahrif
"For they are the *** intended by the expression of every tongue
So he came to them while they were prominent from the *** words, manifest without concealment
So he denied their realities and gave their wording *** a meaning other than their true subject"
Well, he sought to change the meanings, for they are the intended by the expression of every tongue. So if he says: In the saying of Allah the Exalted: and the command of your Lord came, it is as if he erased the saying of Allah the Exalted: and replaced it with what? The command of your Lord came. But he could not do it with the wording, so he turned to the meaning and said: meaning the command of your Lord came. Yes, and therefore he says:
"So he came to them", meaning the meanings, "while they were prominent from the *** words, manifest without concealment"
Meaning he came to them while they were clear and evident, indicated by the wording without concealment
"So he denied their realities and gave their wording *** a meaning other than their true subject"
He denied their realities. The last example we mentioned: He said: The intended meaning is not that He Himself came, but rather that His command came. So he denied the reality and gave the wording a meaning other than its subject. What is the subject of "Your Lord came"? That He Himself came, in reality. He said: No, His command came. So he gave the reality another meaning other than the true subject
"So he committed a crime against the meaning, the crime of a denier, *** and he committed a crime against the words by aggression"
Do you have a denier or a struggler? I have two versions. He committed a crime against the meaning, the crime of a denier, because if he says the meaning of is "His command came," he has denied the original meaning, which is the coming of Allah (Glorified and Exalted is He) Himself
"And he committed a crime against the words by aggression", where he distorted them and said: Their meaning is such and such. This is a crime against them.
"For they are the *** intended by the expression of every tongue
So he came to them while they were prominent from the *** words, manifest without concealment
So he denied their realities and gave their wording *** a meaning other than their true subject"
Well, he sought to change the meanings, for they are the intended by the expression of every tongue. So if he says: In the saying of Allah the Exalted:
And your Lord has come
وجاء ربكAnd your Lord came
وجاءَ ربكYour Lord will come
جاء ربك"So he came to them", meaning the meanings, "while they were prominent from the *** words, manifest without concealment"
Meaning he came to them while they were clear and evident, indicated by the wording without concealment
"So he denied their realities and gave their wording *** a meaning other than their true subject"
He denied their realities. The last example we mentioned:
And your Lord has come
وجاء ربك"So he committed a crime against the meaning, the crime of a denier, *** and he committed a crime against the words by aggression"
Do you have a denier or a struggler? I have two versions. He committed a crime against the meaning, the crime of a denier, because if he says the meaning of
And your Lord has come
وجاء ربك"And he committed a crime against the words by aggression", where he distorted them and said: Their meaning is such and such. This is a crime against them.