"And I named it: 'The Optimal Rules Regarding the Attributes of Allah the Exalted and His Beautiful Names'."

The Shaykh :"And I named it: The Optimal Rules Regarding the Attributes of Allah the Exalted and His Beautiful Names" In this sentence, regarding "The Optimal Rules," you may say "And I named it The Optimal Rules," in which case the phrase "The Optimal Rules" through the end is the second object of "I named it," because it is based on the assumption "And I named it this name." Consequently, is it in the genitive case (dammah) and not the nominative (raf')? Or not the accusative (nashb)? How did you answer me? With the genitive and the nominative, the meaning is the same. Fine, is it "al-Qawa'id" with a dammah or with a fathah?
If we want to report the statement and have the entire sentence be the second object of "I named it," then it is in the genitive case.
But if we want "I named" to act upon it, then in that case we say, "I named it al-Qawa'id al-Muthla (The Optimal Rules) regarding the Attributes of Allah and His Beautiful Names."
"Al-Muthla" means possessing the beautiful description in the Attributes of Allah and His Beautiful Names. We mentioned the Attributes, even though the Name precedes the Attribute, for what reason? Go on. The harmony of the pauses: "al-Muthla" and "al-Hasna." Yes. And the mention of the lesser before the greater is for this consideration. This is found in the Qur'an. Allah said about the magicians in Surat Ta-Ha: All of this is for the sake of the harmony of the pauses.