Is there a doubt in the statement that the superlative name means the active participle because of the sharing in the original attribute?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : How do we respond to the evidence of those who interpreted the superlative name as the active participle, where they said that the superlative name implies sharing in the original attribute? How do we respond to this?
The Shaykh : Yes, this is correct. Every attribute of Allah is shared with the attribute of the human being in the original attribute. The All-Knowing in the human is knowledge, and in Allah is knowledge, but they differ according to what they are attributed to. All attributes must be like this.
And were it not for the sharing in the original attribute, we would not have understood their meaning at all. Yes, raise your voice.
The Shaykh : Yes, this is correct. Every attribute of Allah is shared with the attribute of the human being in the original attribute. The All-Knowing in the human is knowledge, and in Allah is knowledge, but they differ according to what they are attributed to. All attributes must be like this.
And were it not for the sharing in the original attribute, we would not have understood their meaning at all. Yes, raise your voice.