Some people on Friday do not limit themselves to merely passing between the rows, but go beyond that, and they have a shalwar on and hit people with it and do not care?

The questioner : Some people on Friday do not limit themselves to merely passing between the rows, but go beyond that. One of them will have a shalwar on, then he lets the shalwar... he leaves it so it flaps, knocking over this man's shemagh and that man's ghutra, the shalwar when he passes between the shoulders of the people, and so on.

The Shaykh : I think Abu Sulayman did not drop it on a hana, to this extent is it in your mind? I mean, you say the shalwar, you say this, hitting the people.

The questioner : We see them... but he leaves the shalwar, the shalwar is long...

The Shaykh : In any case, a person should be gentle with his brothers, and if he does this, their hearts will be pleased.
The reciter: And may Allah send blessings and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and all his companions.
Imam Abu Abdullah al-Bukhari (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Chapter: A man does not move his brother on Friday and sit in his place.
Muhammad, he is Ibn Salam, narrated to us, Makhlad ibn Yazid narrated to us, Ibn Jurayj narrated to us, he said: I heard Nafi' say: I heard Ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) say: I asked Nafi', "Is it Friday?" He said: "Friday and other days."

The Shaykh : And with this, the chapter heading of al-Bukhari (may Allah have mercy on him) is more specific than what came from Nafi'.
And the correct view is the generality. Ibn Umar said: The apparent meaning of the hadith is that this applies to public gatherings other than mosques, and also in mosques, because of the aggression, self-admiration, and sowing of hatred and enmity between the man who moves and the one who was moved.
The apparent meaning of the prohibition is that it is forbidden, and it is so. It is forbidden for a person to move another from his place and sit in it, because that is aggression and injustice, and a cause of enmity, hatred, resentment, and grudges.
If someone says that his statement: implies that the prohibition is from moving a man, and that if a man moves a boy, there is no harm?
We say: Some scholars (may Allah have mercy on them) said so, and some of the Companions also did so, based on the saying of the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him): , but the correct view is the opposite, and that it is not permissible to move a boy except if there is harm in him from mischief or noise or something like that, in which case he is moved. As for if the boy is an adolescent and close to puberty, then we do not move him. And the saying of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him and his family): means a command for those of sound judgment and intellect to move forward. He did not say "Let no one stand near me except these." If he had said "Let no one stand near me," we would say yes, the Messenger prohibited anyone but those of sound judgment and intellect from standing near him. But he said: "Let me be approached," which is an indication that it is recommended for those of sound judgment and intellect to move forward so that they are in the proximity of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) in order to learn and understand, because the young ones or the insane do not understand. And moving a boy from his place in the mosque has a real harm that is not forgotten. The boy does not forget. If one of the people, and you for example are ten or twelve years old, moved you and said "go there," yes, do you forget this? I do not think you forget. A person does not forget it, and the one who moved him does not forget it either. It will always be on his mind, and when it is mentioned to him, his soul is agitated. And this is one of the matters that Islam fights against.
Then there is another harm in it, which is driving this boy away from the mosque if he is poor. If he comes forward and sits and reads the Qur'an, and he is 12 or 10 years old, someone comes and says "get up, go there." This is driving away. So there is harm in it. Then if we say "postpone the boys, put them behind," we postponed them to the second row. People came in the second row, we said "postpone them to the third." Then the boys gathered in one row, what will happen? It will be mischief and disturbance to the people. But if they are among the men, it becomes easier and more controlled.
So the correct view is that it is not permissible to move a person from his place except if harm comes from him, in which case he is moved to prevent his harm.
And in the saying of the Messenger: , the word "his brother" implies compassion and tenderness toward his brother.
So in this, the use of words that achieves more of the intended meaning than if other words were used, yes.
The explanation, the first opening?