Addendum to the benefits of the hadith prohibiting the removal of the canine tooth and the nail.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The hadith has a benefit, which is that it is recommended to provide the reasons for rulings, especially those whose wisdom is obscure, because the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) said: and so on. As for the canine tooth, it is a good bone. Here we have a point of difficulty regarding "not the nail and the canine tooth." The one I have says "not the nail and the canine tooth," but perhaps there is another wording. Yes, this is another wording. Now, in "not the canine tooth and the nail," why is "canine tooth" in the accusative case, Mustafa?
The student: Because it is an exception.
The Shaykh : An exception, correct? Yes.
The student: Because it is the predicate of "laysa" (is not).
The Shaykh : What do you say? Yes, it is well known that this is in the accusative case due to being an exception. Therefore, the subject of "laysa" here is necessarily hidden; it cannot be present, meaning it never appears, so that it resembles the form of an exception. Yes.
I will inform you about that
سأخبركم عن ذلكThe student: Because it is an exception.
The Shaykh : An exception, correct? Yes.
The student: Because it is the predicate of "laysa" (is not).
The Shaykh : What do you say? Yes, it is well known that this is in the accusative case due to being an exception. Therefore, the subject of "laysa" here is necessarily hidden; it cannot be present, meaning it never appears, so that it resembles the form of an exception. Yes.