What is the response to the evidence cited by al-Bukhari regarding the one who released the arrow in forgetfulness and did not mention the name?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : The response to the evidence cited by al-Bukhari regarding the one who released the arrow without mentioning the name.
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : He cited it as evidence for the heading, so a man shot at him with an arrow and stopped it. He cited it as evidence for the chapter.
The Shaykh : There is no evidence in it; there is no evidence.
The questioner : He used it as an argument.
The Shaykh : Yes, but there is no evidence in it, because the absence of mention is not a mention of absence. As long as it is established that it is a condition, if he remained silent about it because it is known, and this principle has passed us many times: the absence of mention is not a mention of absence in what is known and familiar. Also, does the word "stopped it" mean that he died, or does it mean they stopped it from the enemy and caught its slaughter? Did you mention anything? Nothing was mentioned.
The questioner : "Stopped it" means he hit him with an arrow and he stopped.
The Shaykh : He stopped, yes.
The questioner : Why is the witness not at the end of the hadith?
The Shaykh : Which one is it?
The questioner : He did not let the blood flow and did not mention the name of Allah, so eat.
The Shaykh : But al-Bukhari holds that the mention of the name is not a condition for the slaughtered animal, but Brother Khalid says "stopped it" means he stopped.
The questioner : He hit him with an arrow and he stopped.
The Shaykh : It means he did not die, yes.
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : He cited it as evidence for the heading, so a man shot at him with an arrow and stopped it. He cited it as evidence for the chapter.
The Shaykh : There is no evidence in it; there is no evidence.
The questioner : He used it as an argument.
The Shaykh : Yes, but there is no evidence in it, because the absence of mention is not a mention of absence. As long as it is established that it is a condition, if he remained silent about it because it is known, and this principle has passed us many times: the absence of mention is not a mention of absence in what is known and familiar. Also, does the word "stopped it" mean that he died, or does it mean they stopped it from the enemy and caught its slaughter? Did you mention anything? Nothing was mentioned.
The questioner : "Stopped it" means he hit him with an arrow and he stopped.
The Shaykh : He stopped, yes.
The questioner : Why is the witness not at the end of the hadith?
The Shaykh : Which one is it?
The questioner : He did not let the blood flow and did not mention the name of Allah, so eat.
The Shaykh : But al-Bukhari holds that the mention of the name is not a condition for the slaughtered animal, but Brother Khalid says "stopped it" means he stopped.
The questioner : He hit him with an arrow and he stopped.
The Shaykh : It means he did not die, yes.