A Hadith Benefit: ( ... Ibn al-Zubayr says: I heard 'Umar say: The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said:
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Now, how do we reconcile the first and second narrations? Do we say that the other two narrations contain an addition in the connected chains? Or do we say the first one is a mursal (report missing the Companion link)? Or do we say it does not preclude that Ibn al-Zubayr heard it from the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) and also heard it from 'Umar, so that sometimes he narrates it as having heard it from the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) and sometimes as having heard it from 'Umar? These are three possibilities: the first possibility.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : That there is an addition in the connected chains, and this is unlikely.
The second is that the first context is a mursal (report missing the Companion link), meaning that Ibn al-Zubayr omitted the intermediary between him and the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him). If this were established, it would not be harmful, it would not be harmful for two reasons: the first reason is that this omission is clarified in the other narration, so the fear of the unknown is removed; and the second is that the mursal (report missing the Companion link) of a Companion has the ruling of a connected chain, not the ruling of a broken chain, and this does not cast doubt on the authenticity of the hadith.
The third aspect is that Ibn al-Zubayr heard it directly from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), as indicated by the first context, and he heard it through 'Umar, so he sometimes narrates it with the intermediary and sometimes without the intermediary. In any case, what is the hadith? The hadith is authentic, there is no defect in its authenticity. Yes.
The questioner : ... he heard it from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), what is the benefit ... that he narrates it ..
The Shaykh : Strengthening, strengthening, the benefit is strengthening. Yes.
The questioner : That is all.
The Shaykh : Is the time up?
What Allah willed.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Did I write it?
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Come on, the brothers know about it, you. Did you understand what was yesterday, the puzzle in inheritance? The maternal uncle inherited and the paternal uncle did not inherit, this is from the brother Hidayat Allah, and now he will read it to you.
The questioner : Does he take the microphone, O Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : The microphone ..
The Shaykh : He takes the microphone, okay.
The questioner : No one answered ... O Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : No one answered it?
The Shaykh : The brother Sami answered it. The brother Sami answered it. Right?
The questioner : ... so they understand, O Shaykh, the diagrams.
The Shaykh : Yes, the diagrams are better, better than the.
The questioner : With drawing it is better.
Another questioner : Easier.
The Shaykh : With drawing?
The questioner : No, but ... people understand.
The Shaykh : Come on, say it.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : That there is an addition in the connected chains, and this is unlikely.
The second is that the first context is a mursal (report missing the Companion link), meaning that Ibn al-Zubayr omitted the intermediary between him and the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him). If this were established, it would not be harmful, it would not be harmful for two reasons: the first reason is that this omission is clarified in the other narration, so the fear of the unknown is removed; and the second is that the mursal (report missing the Companion link) of a Companion has the ruling of a connected chain, not the ruling of a broken chain, and this does not cast doubt on the authenticity of the hadith.
The third aspect is that Ibn al-Zubayr heard it directly from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), as indicated by the first context, and he heard it through 'Umar, so he sometimes narrates it with the intermediary and sometimes without the intermediary. In any case, what is the hadith? The hadith is authentic, there is no defect in its authenticity. Yes.
The questioner : ... he heard it from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), what is the benefit ... that he narrates it ..
The Shaykh : Strengthening, strengthening, the benefit is strengthening. Yes.
The questioner : That is all.
The Shaykh : Is the time up?
What Allah willed.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Did I write it?
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : Yes.
The Shaykh : Come on, the brothers know about it, you. Did you understand what was yesterday, the puzzle in inheritance? The maternal uncle inherited and the paternal uncle did not inherit, this is from the brother Hidayat Allah, and now he will read it to you.
The questioner : Does he take the microphone, O Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : The microphone ..
The Shaykh : He takes the microphone, okay.
The questioner : No one answered ... O Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : No one answered it?
The Shaykh : The brother Sami answered it. The brother Sami answered it. Right?
The questioner : ... so they understand, O Shaykh, the diagrams.
The Shaykh : Yes, the diagrams are better, better than the.
The questioner : With drawing it is better.
Another questioner : Easier.
The Shaykh : With drawing?
The questioner : No, but ... people understand.
The Shaykh : Come on, say it.