Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Naming those who commit the heinous act as "Lutian": Is this designation correct?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Shaykh, naming those who commit the heinous act as "Lutian": Is this designation correct?

The Shaykh : Yes, that is correct.

The questioner : Named after whom?

The Shaykh : After the people of Lut.

The questioner : But Shaykh, now we say the Jahmiyyah are named after Jahm, and the Mu'tazilah are named after those who withdrew, and so on?

The Shaykh : Correct. Regarding affiliation, it is permissible to attribute it to the attribute or to the noun in the construct phrase. For example, in the attribution to Imru' al-Qays, one says "Imru'i" or "Qaysi."
This is the same case, and the scholars have continued to say so.

The questioner : But Shaykh, could it be that the first person who said it made a mistake, and then people followed him in it?

The Shaykh : No, no, people do not notice it!
But since the attribution can be made to the noun in the construct phrase, it is correct.

The questioner : ...

The Shaykh : Most of the terms do not have:
and he is not killed ولا يقتل
at all, but if the term is preserved, I do not know what the difference is.
Do you have anything in the commentary on the hadith?
The reader: He did not mention anything.
The student: It says: "Its detailed explanation was presented at the beginning of the Book of Punishments" the hadith of Abu Hurayrah.

The Shaykh : But it did not pass us:
and he is not killed ولا يقتل
it contains:
and he is not killed ولا يقتل
.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas