Continuation of the benefits of the hadith: “Where am I tomorrow?” (meaning Aisha’s day…)

The Shaykh : In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful:
We take the benefits of the hadith of Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her): : The hadith:
Among the benefits of this hadith: The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was a human being to whom the rulings of humanity apply, as she said: So he would get sick, get hungry, get cold, get hot, and forget. All human nature would affect him, peace and blessings be upon him.
And among its benefits: The refutation of those who say that the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) was light, and that he had no shadow, because his getting sick, asking, and talking indicates that he was like other bodies, a dense body that blocks the sun when it comes between it and the earth, so he would have a shadow.
And among the benefits of the hadith: That the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) died, as she said: And this death is real, but it is the death of the body, whereas in the barzakh (the interval between death and resurrection), he is alive in his grave, peace and blessings be upon him.
And among the benefits of this hadith: The perfection of the justice of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), where he asks: “Where am I tomorrow?”, knowing that he loved Aisha more than the others, and this is well known among his wives, but due to the perfection of his justice, he says: .
And among the benefits of this hadith: Acting on circumstantial evidence, because the women understood from that that he meant Aisha’s day, and for this reason they said: “He means Aisha’s day.” So acting on circumstantial evidence is established in the Shari'ah. From this is the story of Yusuf (Joseph) when the wife of the Minister invited him to herself and he refused, then she accused him: , because if it was torn from the front, it indicates that he was the one seeking, and that she tore his garment when he fled from her. And if it was torn from the back, from behind, it indicates that he was the one being sought and that he was fleeing, and she was the one who caught up with him. So this is a circumstantial evidence, and the circumstantial evidence indicated that she was the one seeking, . So acting on circumstantial evidence is established in the Shari'ah, and it is one of the best things a judge uses to know the liar. And if a person is given understanding in this aspect, he will attain much good. Have you seen the story of the two women, the younger and the older, who went out one day with their two sons? So the wolf ate the son of the older one. The older one claimed that the remaining son was hers. So they referred the matter to Dawud (David), and he ruled in favor of the older one. Then they went out from him and passed by Sulayman (Solomon), and perhaps he saw something of their condition that made him ask them. So they told him the story. He said: “The ruling is not with me.” Then he called for a knife to cut it in half. As for the older one, she agreed. As for the younger one, she objected. So he ruled in favor of the younger one. How did he rule in favor of the younger one?
Because the circumstantial evidence indicated that it belonged to the younger one. The younger one said: “It is mine, O Prophet of Allah,” and she showed mercy and compassion for him. As for the older one, since the wolf had eaten her son, she said: “Just as my son was destroyed, let this one be destroyed,” and she said: “Cut it in half, there is no obstacle.” And this indicates that there is no mercy in her heart for this child. Do you understand, people?
So this is acting on circumstantial evidence. And from the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) in acting on circumstantial evidence: When he conquered Khaybar, he asked about the wealth of Huyayy ibn Akhtab, the leader of the Banu Nadir. He asked about it, and they said: : And if the wealth is much and the time is recent, wars would not have consumed it. Then he said to al-Zubayr: meaning: Strike him, , buried. So here the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) acted on circumstantial evidence. So, acting on circumstantial evidence is established in the Shari'ah, yes.
And among the benefits of this hadith: The good treatment of the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) toward him, where they allowed him to be with Aisha, knowing that each of them loved to be with him, but they preferred the comfort of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) over their own comfort.
And among the benefits of this hadith: The great virtue that Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) attained, where the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) chose to have his illness in her house. In addition to that, he died in her lap, between her two thighs, and he died on her day and in her house. The last thing he tasted from the world was her saliva, may Allah be pleased with her. All of this is among her virtues. And she is one of the most hated people to the Rafidah (the Twelver Shi'ah); they hate her intensely, because the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) loved her more than his other wives.
And among the benefits of this hadith: That it is permissible for a man with multiple wives to hint to his wives about choosing one of them, and that this is not considered embarrassing. What is the evidence?
The action of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), for he used to say: until they allowed him.