Is it a condition for one who resides among the disbelievers that he be able to call them to establishing the rites, or is it sufficient for him that he establishes the rites himself?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : Shaykh, may Allah bless you, is it a condition for residing among the disbelievers that a person be able to call others to manifesting the rites, or is it sufficient that he himself is able to establish these rites?
The Shaykh : It is obligatory that he be able to do it himself, not that he be able to call [others], yes?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Huh?
The questioner : The reason for not mixing with the disbelievers ... is that one of the reasons is that they may have eaten pork in these vessels, is this not a reason, O Shaykh? ... The hadith is weak and not authentic.
The Shaykh : We said there is a consideration in this, because if this were the reason, one washing would suffice without us needing to find another, because they are not considered impure vessels; they are washed and eaten from, Khalid?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : It is not piety to fast while traveling.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : It is possible ...
The Shaykh : No, this ... this is specific to one who was in such a situation and it is now difficult ... it is difficult because Salim had been adopted by his master, and adoption is now prohibited from that time, come on, Samir.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Give the reason?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : What is it?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : No, these are all circumstances.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : But this is impure in itself, meaning the skin of what is not lawful to eat is impure in itself, whereas the skin of what is lawful to eat became impure due to a circumstance, which is death, so it is like a garment that became impure, is the difference clear?
The questioner : Shaykh, may Allah bless you, is it a condition for residing among the disbelievers that a person be able to call others to manifesting the rites, or is it sufficient that he himself is able to establish these rites?
The Shaykh : It is obligatory that he be able to do it himself, not that he be able to call [others], yes?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Huh?
The questioner : The reason for not mixing with the disbelievers ... is that one of the reasons is that they may have eaten pork in these vessels, is this not a reason, O Shaykh? ... The hadith is weak and not authentic.
The Shaykh : We said there is a consideration in this, because if this were the reason, one washing would suffice without us needing to find another, because they are not considered impure vessels; they are washed and eaten from, Khalid?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : It is not piety to fast while traveling.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : It is possible ...
The Shaykh : No, this ... this is specific to one who was in such a situation and it is now difficult ... it is difficult because Salim had been adopted by his master, and adoption is now prohibited from that time, come on, Samir.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Give the reason?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : What is it?
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : No, these are all circumstances.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : But this is impure in itself, meaning the skin of what is not lawful to eat is impure in itself, whereas the skin of what is lawful to eat became impure due to a circumstance, which is death, so it is like a garment that became impure, is the difference clear?