Is it valid to cite the hadith of Ibn Mas'ud as evidence for the permissibility of continuing to carry impurity in a manner that does not spread it?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Shaykh, regarding the hadith of Ibn Mas'ud, is it valid to cite it as evidence for the permissibility of directly touching impurity in a manner that does not spread it?
The Shaykh : No.
The questioner : He threw the dung.
The Shaykh : Yes, he threw the dung. There is no evidence in it.
The questioner : It is not apparent that he directly touched the impurity.
The Shaykh : The apparent fact is that it was dry. The apparent fact is that it was dry. If it had not been dry, he would not have brought it.
The questioner : This is the question, Shaykh.
The Shaykh : No, this is not what is called directly touching impurity, because as long as it is dry and what is being touched is dry, it is not called directly touching impurity.
The Shaykh : No.
The questioner : He threw the dung.
The Shaykh : Yes, he threw the dung. There is no evidence in it.
The questioner : It is not apparent that he directly touched the impurity.
The Shaykh : The apparent fact is that it was dry. The apparent fact is that it was dry. If it had not been dry, he would not have brought it.
The questioner : This is the question, Shaykh.
The Shaykh : No, this is not what is called directly touching impurity, because as long as it is dry and what is being touched is dry, it is not called directly touching impurity.