Do we say that the necessary implication of the Qadariyyah's position is that the servant is the creator of his actions?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : The Shaykh mentioned the Jabriyyah, meaning they are further from what I said than the Mu'tazilah.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : So are the Mu'tazilah further away when they made the Creator...?
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : When they made the Creator of the actions of the servants other than Allah?
The Shaykh : No, no, they did not make the Creator [other than Allah]; they say that the human being, in reality, acts by will, and we do not say: that he is a Creator or not a Creator, we say: he acts by his will and choice, and Allah has no connection to it.
But the scholars said: When you said that the human being is independent in his action, you affirmed a Creator alongside Allah the Exalted and Majestic; this is a logical implication for them, and they do not commit to this.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : No, I do not think so, but the scholars said that the intended meaning of the hadith is that they are the Majus of this Ummah.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : So are the Mu'tazilah further away when they made the Creator...?
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : When they made the Creator of the actions of the servants other than Allah?
The Shaykh : No, no, they did not make the Creator [other than Allah]; they say that the human being, in reality, acts by will, and we do not say: that he is a Creator or not a Creator, we say: he acts by his will and choice, and Allah has no connection to it.
But the scholars said: When you said that the human being is independent in his action, you affirmed a Creator alongside Allah the Exalted and Majestic; this is a logical implication for them, and they do not commit to this.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : No, I do not think so, but the scholars said that the intended meaning of the hadith is that they are the Majus of this Ummah.