Continuation of the Explanation

The Shaykh : And there remains a point in my view that the Hafiz did not mention, in his statement: which is that the intended meaning of his statement: is the generic sense, meaning that she is not the mother in reality, but the meaning is that slave women give birth to the sons of kings, regardless of whether this mother herself is raised, so this is the apparent meaning. Or that a slave woman gives birth to a person who becomes a king thereafter, so the intended meaning is the generic sense, meaning that it is not the specific mother herself, but the generic sense is intended, and this often occurs in the Arabic language, where the generic sense is intended.
Such as His saying, the Exalted: The intended meaning here is the generic sense, not the specific individual, and for this reason it is not correct to apply it to Adam and Eve, but rather the intended meaning is meaning from one generic type, and He created from her his wife: meaning He made him from her of her generic type etc.
This is clear, because he is not her master, he is her son, so how can he be her master?

The questioner : ...

The Shaykh : This means that due to the abundance of gestures, concubines, and conquests, this thing occurred, and indicating this is his statement: , this is an allusion to the abundance of wealth, and that the poor shepherds, yes, as it came in the wording of Muslim: , and this seems to be an indication of the abundance of conquests, for this is one of the signs of the Hour, and the connection is apparent, because the abundance of conquests means reaching the limit of a thing, and every thing in this world that reaches its limit will then decline.