Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Discussion of the interpretation of the saying of Allah the Exalted: “And you were not concealing that your hearing, your sight, and your skins would testify against you, but you thought that Allah would not know much of what you do”

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : I seek refuge in Allah from the accursed Shaytan. Allah, Blessed and Exalted is He, said:
And you were not covering yourselves, lest your hearing testify against you or your sight or your skins وما كنتم تستترون أن يشهد عليكم سمعكم ولا أبصاركم ولا جلودكم
[Fussilat 41:22]
What is the meaning of the verse? In general, I do not want you to interpret every word, but what is its meaning? ...
And you were not covering yourselves, lest your hearing testify against you or your sight or your skins وما كنتم تستترون أن يشهد عليكم سمعكم ولا أبصاركم ولا جلودكم
[Fussilat 41:22]
Meaning, you were not concealing out of fear from ... Yes, well done. His saying:
And that was your assumption which you assumed about your Lord وذلكم ظنُّكم الذي ظننتم بربكم
[Fussilat 41:23]
Now, parse the sentence? No, not in detail like: “That” is the subject, “that” is the predicate, okay, “your assumption”?
The student: “Your assumption”? It is permissible for it to be the predicate

The Shaykh : Give us one of the things you say that it is permissible
The student: The predicate

The Shaykh : “Your assumption” is the predicate? Yes, and
That you assumedالذي ظننتم
?
The student: This is a descriptor

The Shaykh : Okay,
Destroyed youأرداكُم
?
The student:
Destroyed youأرداكُم
is the second predicate

The Shaykh : The second predicate, okay, is there a second perspective in the parsing, Ya Ayub? Is there a second perspective in the parsing? Come on, Ya Ayub, say yes or no
The student: ... I am not paying attention

The Shaykh : This is my constant trouble with you, you are not paying attention. What is wrong with you? Do you miss your family?
The student:
That is.ذلكم
is the subject,
Your assumptionظنكم
is an apposition to it, and
That you assumedالذي ظننتم
is a descriptor, and
I have destroyed youأرداكم
is the predicate

The Shaykh : And
I have destroyed youأرداكم
is the predicate. So, both opinions agree that
what you supposedالذي ظننتم
is a descriptor. Okay,
and you have become among the losers." أصبحْتم من الخاسرين
[Fussilat 41:23]
What is the meaning of “you became” here?
The student: You became

The Shaykh : You became. What is its meaning that matches the wording?
The student: “Became” means became in the morning, this is the original meaning

The Shaykh : Yes, this is the original meaning, but it can be used to mean “became.” Yes, okay. His saying:
So [even] if they are patient, the Fire is a residence for them فإن يصبروا فالنار مثوى لهم
[Fussilat 41:24]
What is the connection between the answer to the condition and the verb of the condition?
So [even] if they are patient, the Fire is a residence for them فإن يصبروا فالنار مثوى لهم
[Fussilat 41:24]
What is the connection? Meaning, this connection may be hidden from you, because a person would expect the answer to the condition to be the opposite of that
The student: A severe threat to them, in the sense of despair ...

The Shaykh : Its connection to what came before it { do not use this, it will have a bad smell }. Okay, its connection is to make these people despair of relief, because the apparent situation would suggest saying: “If they are patient, then relief is near,” for example. But he said: “The Fire is their dwelling place.” Meaning, they will not be freed from it.
if they ask to appease [Allah], they will not be of those who are allowed to appease. إن يستعتبوا فما هم من المعتَبِين
[Fussilat 41:24]
What is the meaning of “seek forgiveness”?
The student: They seek pardon

The Shaykh : And what is it?
The student: Meaning, the excuse .... the excuse

The Shaykh : The excuse, then acceptance. Okay,
they will not be of those who are allowed to appease. فما هم من المعتبين
[Fussilat 41:24]
?
The student: Meaning, Allah will not be pleased with them

The Shaykh : Okay, parse
they will not be of those who are allowed to appease. فما هم من المعتبين
[Fussilat 41:24]
?
The student: The “fa” (so) is according to what came before it

The Shaykh : No, it is not according to what came before it. It is known,
and if they ask to appease [Allah], they will not be of those who are allowed to appease. وإن يستعتبوا فما هم من المعتَبِين
[Fussilat 41:24]
the “fa”?
The student: ... It is a connector for the answer to the condition

The Shaykh : A connector for the answer to the condition. Okay, continue.
notما
? In the language of whom?
The student: Generally, Hijazi

The Shaykh : Yes, as long as you say it functions, it functions like “laysa” ... Okay, the name of “ma”? ... It is built ... in the position of what? ... And its sign of genitive? “Al-mu'tabina” (the forgiven), the kasrah is apparent at the end of it, yes? ... Yes, a preposition and its object, connected to a deleted predicate of
notما
. Okay, here the Hijazi and Tamimi languages agree in terms of wording, is that not so? Does the wording differ if we make it Tamimi?
The student: The wording does not differ

The Shaykh : So, the two languages agree in terms of wording, and differ in terms of parsing. Okay,
This is not a human being ما هذا بشرا
Do the two languages agree in this?
The student:
this is not a human being ما هذا بشرًا
No

The Shaykh : The Tamimi language is to say
The student: ... In Tamimi, it is said “ma hadha basharun” (this is not a human)

The Shaykh : “Ma hadha basharun” (this is not a human), do you agree with that? Yes, because
notما
is neglected by the Tamimi and functions like
laysaليس
by the Hijazi. So you would say, for example: “Ma Zaydun qaiman” (Zayd is not standing) if you addressed a person and said “Ma Zaydun qaiman.” We know that you are what? Hijazi. And if you addressed a person and said: “Ma Zaydun qaimun” (Zayd is not standing), we know that you are Tamimi. And for this reason, the poet said
And Muhaffaf al-A'ataf, I said to him, “State your lineage” - meaning, where are you from? - so he answered: “Ma qatlu al-muhibbi haramu” (The killing of the lover is not forbidden)
Did he inform him of his lineage or not? That he is Tamimi. For if he had not been Tamimi, he would have said: “Ma qatlu al-muhibbi haraman” (The killing of the lover is not forbidden). And Mas'ud, repeat the verse for us
The student: Ma qatlu al-muhibbi

The Shaykh : No, no, the verse is not ...
The student: I do not remember it

The Shaykh : You do not remember it, I will repeat it, but we said it recently. Now we start the lesson, today's lesson
The student: And Muhaffaf al-A'ataf, I said to him, “State your lineage,” so he answered: “Ma qatlu al-habibi haramu” (The killing of the beloved is not forbidden)

The Shaykh : “Al-muhibbi” (the lover), may Allah bless you. Okay, we start our lesson now, today's lesson
The student: Shaykh, may Allah bless you. Regarding the parsing of
they are not among those who are forgiven ما هم بمعتبين
, Shaykh, can we make
notما
this an extra preposition?

The Shaykh : Where?
The student:
they are not among those who are forgiven ما هم بمعتبين


The Shaykh : This is from your pocket, my boy. It is in the Qur'an,
they will not be of those who are allowed to appease. فما هم من المعتبين
[Fussilat 41:24]
.
Allah, Blessed and Exalted is He, said:
And We appointed for them companions who made attractive to them what was before them and what was behind them وَقَيَّضْنَا لَهُمْ قُرَنَاءَ فَزَيَّنُوا لَهُمْ مَا بَيْنَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَمَا خَلْفَهُمْ
[Fussilat 41:25]
to the end of it.
We assigned for themقيضنا لهم
He says: “We caused
Their. لهم
”

The student: Shaykh, we did not take the benefits

The Shaykh : What? Strange, from where?
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas