Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

On the saying of Allah the Exalted: ((Were it not that he saw the proof of his Lord)) and is the "were it not" here conditional?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: His saying, may He be Exalted, in Surat Yusuf:
Had he not seen the proof of his Lord لولا أن رأى برهان ربه
Is this
Why notلولا
conditional, or what? It is confusing to me...

The Shaykh : Read what comes before it:
And she certainly determined [to seduce] him, and he would have inclined to her had he not seen the proof of his Lord ولقد همَّت به وهَمَّ بها لولا أن رأى برهان ربه
[Yusuf 12:24]
meaning "he would have done it," so it is conditional, but the answer is omitted.
The student: Did the desire occur from him?

The Shaykh : Yes, meaning: Were it not for the proof of his Lord, he would have done it, meaning he would have responded to her invitation. It is not: Were it not for the proof of his Lord, he would not have desired her, because if that were the case, the speech would be contradictory. Rather, he did desire her, but were it not that he saw the proof of his Lord, he would have responded to what she invited him to. Yes.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas