Explanation of the author's statement: It contains issues: The first: The definition of ruqyah and amulets.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"It contains issues: The first: The definition of ruqyah and amulets" What are ruqyah and amulets?
The student: Hanging them on [people].
The Shaykh : What are ruqyah?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Reciting over the sick person is this ruqyah, reciting over the sick person. And you have known that reciting over the sick person is permissible with three conditions. Now, what are amulets? Something that is hung on children to ward off the evil eye, or we say: what is hung on a person generally, whether on children or adults, and whether to ward off the evil eye or for healing from illness or for other reasons, or on animals. Yes, or on animals.
"The second: The definition of tawilah" What is tawilah? Something they make which they claim causes a woman to love her husband and the husband to love his wife. In my view, among them is what is called the dablah, because they claim that this is a bond between a man and his wife, to the extent that some of them say, why... He said, if I remove it, she will be angry with me. The woman says, he does not love us because he threw me from his hand. The meaning of that is that he threw his love from his heart. This is not correct.
And among them is also "The third: That all three of these are shirk - and it is permissible - that all three of these are shirk without exception" even ruqyah. The apparent wording of his statement, yes, the apparent wording of the author is that even ruqyah [is shirk]. But there is consideration in this, because it is established from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) that he used to perform ruqyah and that he used to be subjected to ruqyah, but he did not seek ruqyah, he did not request ruqyah. So generalizing the attribution [of shirk] to ruqyah is subject to consideration. As for amulets, according to the opinion of Ibn Mas'ud.
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : It is correct, and according to the opinion of the majority, there is also consideration in it. Is there anything in tawilah? The Shaykh's statement has no consideration in it, yes.
The student: Hanging them on [people].
The Shaykh : What are ruqyah?
The student: ... .
The Shaykh : Reciting over the sick person is this ruqyah, reciting over the sick person. And you have known that reciting over the sick person is permissible with three conditions. Now, what are amulets? Something that is hung on children to ward off the evil eye, or we say: what is hung on a person generally, whether on children or adults, and whether to ward off the evil eye or for healing from illness or for other reasons, or on animals. Yes, or on animals.
"The second: The definition of tawilah" What is tawilah? Something they make which they claim causes a woman to love her husband and the husband to love his wife. In my view, among them is what is called the dablah, because they claim that this is a bond between a man and his wife, to the extent that some of them say, why... He said, if I remove it, she will be angry with me. The woman says, he does not love us because he threw me from his hand. The meaning of that is that he threw his love from his heart. This is not correct.
And among them is also "The third: That all three of these are shirk - and it is permissible - that all three of these are shirk without exception" even ruqyah. The apparent wording of his statement, yes, the apparent wording of the author is that even ruqyah [is shirk]. But there is consideration in this, because it is established from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) that he used to perform ruqyah and that he used to be subjected to ruqyah, but he did not seek ruqyah, he did not request ruqyah. So generalizing the attribution [of shirk] to ruqyah is subject to consideration. As for amulets, according to the opinion of Ibn Mas'ud.
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : It is correct, and according to the opinion of the majority, there is also consideration in it. Is there anything in tawilah? The Shaykh's statement has no consideration in it, yes.