Some grammarians say that an explicit noun conjoined to a noun in the genitive case with a preposition is not conjoined to an attached pronoun unless the preposition is repeated; how do we derive this from the verse?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Some grammarians say that the conjoined noun to the noun
The Shaykh : He says that
The student: He says that
The Shaykh : that
The student: That.
The Shaykh : It continued that
The questioner : He says that
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed
The questioner : He says that an explicit noun conjoined to a noun in the genitive case with a preposition is not conjoined to it unless the preposition is repeated. This has passed us by tonight
The Shaykh : to the pronoun; it is not conjoined to an attached pronoun unless the preposition is repeated
The questioner : and the explicit noun
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : and the explicit noun
The Shaykh : is conjoined to it without repeating the preposition
The questioner : Now, how do we respond to them with his saying:[An-Nisa 4:1]
The Shaykh : Yes, that is right.
The questioner : on the reading of the genitive case
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : this would be anomalous
The Shaykh : They say that the correct opinion is the permissibility of conjoining to an attached pronoun in the genitive case without repeating the preposition; this is the correct view
The questioner : And as for the one who says this is anomalous
The Shaykh : Yes, we say: You are the one who is anomalous. How can the speech of Allah be anomalous?!
The questioner : He says it is according to the language of
The Shaykh : What language? Do you find anything more eloquent than the language of the Qur'an, in a clear Arabic tongue? Therefore, in reality, those who say that this is anomalous in the Noble Qur'an are to be feared for. Anomalous according to what? It is obligatory that you build your rules based on the Qur'an, not that the Qur'an is built based on the rules, because the Qur'an is Arabic, and what comes after? And al-Masjid al-Haram. The point is that it is not just one verse. If one of the poets, like Imru' al-Qays or someone else, said something like this, we would say it is anomalous, if it is true that the most common occurrence in the Arabic language is the repetition of the preposition, do you understand? Yes.
The Shaykh : He says that
The student: He says that
The Shaykh : that
The student: That.
The Shaykh : It continued that
The questioner : He says that
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed
The questioner : He says that an explicit noun conjoined to a noun in the genitive case with a preposition is not conjoined to it unless the preposition is repeated. This has passed us by tonight
The Shaykh : to the pronoun; it is not conjoined to an attached pronoun unless the preposition is repeated
The questioner : and the explicit noun
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : and the explicit noun
The Shaykh : is conjoined to it without repeating the preposition
The questioner : Now, how do we respond to them with his saying:
through whom you ask one another, and the wombs
الذي تساءلون به والأرحامThe Shaykh : Yes, that is right.
The questioner : on the reading of the genitive case
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : this would be anomalous
The Shaykh : They say that the correct opinion is the permissibility of conjoining to an attached pronoun in the genitive case without repeating the preposition; this is the correct view
The questioner : And as for the one who says this is anomalous
The Shaykh : Yes, we say: You are the one who is anomalous. How can the speech of Allah be anomalous?!
The questioner : He says it is according to the language of
The Shaykh : What language? Do you find anything more eloquent than the language of the Qur'an, in a clear Arabic tongue? Therefore, in reality, those who say that this is anomalous in the Noble Qur'an are to be feared for. Anomalous according to what? It is obligatory that you build your rules based on the Qur'an, not that the Qur'an is built based on the rules, because the Qur'an is Arabic,