Ibn Malik's statement, "And make the omitted verb act upon the pronoun of what they contested," is this pronoun explicit or hidden?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes, Khalid?
The student: "And make the omitted verb act upon the pronoun of what they contested".
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Is this pronoun explicit or hidden?
The Shaykh : No, it is a hidden pronoun.
The student: In the example, it is explicit.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is a pronoun, even if it is explicit.
The student: The question is, does it appear as "they do well" (yuhisanan)?
The Shaykh : Yes, if it is dual, it appears; if it is plural, it appears. If it is singular, it does not appear.
The student: Because of his saying, "and he committed to."
The Shaykh : Yes, because of his saying: "And he committed to what you both committed to"
The student: "And make the omitted verb act upon the pronoun of what they contested".
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Is this pronoun explicit or hidden?
The Shaykh : No, it is a hidden pronoun.
The student: In the example, it is explicit.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is a pronoun, even if it is explicit.
The student: The question is, does it appear as "they do well" (yuhisanan)?
The Shaykh : Yes, if it is dual, it appears; if it is plural, it appears. If it is singular, it does not appear.
The student: Because of his saying, "and he committed to."
The Shaykh : Yes, because of his saying: "And he committed to what you both committed to"