Explanation of the statement of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): The Object of Accompaniment
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
He (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "The Object of Accompaniment" is with it. The word "with" signifies companionship. So the meaning of the Object of Accompaniment is the object for the sake of companionship, for the sake of companionship. The Object of Accompaniment is a noun in the accusative case that comes after the "waw" of companionship, which is preceded by a verb or its meaning. It is a noun in the accusative case that comes after the "waw" of companionship, which is preceded by a verb or its meaning. For example: "Muhammad walked and the road." The meaning of "and the road" is: everyone knows that the intended meaning is "with the road," and that it is not permissible for the "waw" here to be a conjunction, because the road does not walk, is that not so?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Now, did the water and the wood become level, or did the water become level and the wood?
The student: And the wood.
The Shaykh : And the wood, meaning: with the wood, since it is not possible for the meaning to be: the water became level and the wood became level. The Object of Accompaniment is clear; it is that it comes after a "waw" that is explicit in companionship, preceded by a verb or its meaning, and it cannot be a conjunction, it cannot be a conjunction. For this reason, the author stated his definition by its ruling, stating his definition by its ruling.
He (may Allah have mercy on him) said: "The Object of Accompaniment" is with it. The word "with" signifies companionship. So the meaning of the Object of Accompaniment is the object for the sake of companionship, for the sake of companionship. The Object of Accompaniment is a noun in the accusative case that comes after the "waw" of companionship, which is preceded by a verb or its meaning. It is a noun in the accusative case that comes after the "waw" of companionship, which is preceded by a verb or its meaning. For example: "Muhammad walked and the road." The meaning of "and the road" is: everyone knows that the intended meaning is "with the road," and that it is not permissible for the "waw" here to be a conjunction, because the road does not walk, is that not so?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Now, did the water and the wood become level, or did the water become level and the wood?
The student: And the wood.
The Shaykh : And the wood, meaning: with the wood, since it is not possible for the meaning to be: the water became level and the wood became level. The Object of Accompaniment is clear; it is that it comes after a "waw" that is explicit in companionship, preceded by a verb or its meaning, and it cannot be a conjunction, it cannot be a conjunction. For this reason, the author stated his definition by its ruling, stating his definition by its ruling.