Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And without freeing, with precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it and adhere."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"And without freeing, with precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it and adhere
And make it accusative for postponement, and bring one *** of them, as if it were without an extra"
Yes, he says:
"And without freeing, with precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it and adhere"
"Without freeing," what does "without freeing" mean? It means: if the operator does not free what comes after "except."
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : So it is not free from: either the exceptions precede or they are postponed. If the exceptions precede, the accusative case is obligatory for all. What does he say:
"With precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it and adhere"
So if the exceptions precede the excluded item, the accusative case is obligatory for all of them. So you would say, for example: "None stood except Zayd, except 'Umar, except Bakr, the people."
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : "None stood except Zayd, except 'Umar, except Bakr, the people." Did you see that "except Zayd, except 'Umar, except Bakr" are exceptions from what?
The student: The people.
The Shaykh : The exceptions have now preceded the excluded item, so the accusative case is obligatory for all. Ibn Malik says:
"With precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it and adhere"
Is it clear? If there is no freeing now, what is obligatory? We say: it is not free from, if you do not free, if the operator does not free what comes after "except," it is not free from either the exceptions preceding or being postponed. If they precede?
The student: The accusative case for all.
The Shaykh : The accusative case is obligatory for all. Where do we take this from his words?
"And without freeing, with precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it"
"Accusative for all, rule by it" The grammatical analysis of "Accusative for all, rule by it": this is from the chapter of *ishtighal* (occupation), it is the object of a deleted verb, because "rule" is occupied by the pronoun, so "by it" is in the accusative case: it is the object of a deleted verb indicated by what follows it, meaning: adhere to the accusative case for all, rule by it, and adhere to this as well, in every Arabic speech or other that comes to you, on the condition that if the exceptions precede the excluded item while the operator is not freed, then it is obligatory?
The student: The accusative case for all.
The Shaykh : The accusative case for all.
And make it accusative for postponement, and bring one *** of them, as if it were without an extra"
Yes, he says:
"And without freeing, with precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it and adhere"
"Without freeing," what does "without freeing" mean? It means: if the operator does not free what comes after "except."
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : So it is not free from: either the exceptions precede or they are postponed. If the exceptions precede, the accusative case is obligatory for all. What does he say:
"With precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it and adhere"
So if the exceptions precede the excluded item, the accusative case is obligatory for all of them. So you would say, for example: "None stood except Zayd, except 'Umar, except Bakr, the people."
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : "None stood except Zayd, except 'Umar, except Bakr, the people." Did you see that "except Zayd, except 'Umar, except Bakr" are exceptions from what?
The student: The people.
The Shaykh : The exceptions have now preceded the excluded item, so the accusative case is obligatory for all. Ibn Malik says:
"With precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it and adhere"
Is it clear? If there is no freeing now, what is obligatory? We say: it is not free from, if you do not free, if the operator does not free what comes after "except," it is not free from either the exceptions preceding or being postponed. If they precede?
The student: The accusative case for all.
The Shaykh : The accusative case is obligatory for all. Where do we take this from his words?
"And without freeing, with precedence *** Accusative for all, rule by it"
"Accusative for all, rule by it" The grammatical analysis of "Accusative for all, rule by it": this is from the chapter of *ishtighal* (occupation), it is the object of a deleted verb, because "rule" is occupied by the pronoun, so "by it" is in the accusative case: it is the object of a deleted verb indicated by what follows it, meaning: adhere to the accusative case for all, rule by it, and adhere to this as well, in every Arabic speech or other that comes to you, on the condition that if the exceptions precede the excluded item while the operator is not freed, then it is obligatory?
The student: The accusative case for all.
The Shaykh : The accusative case for all.