Is Sibawayhi's statement that suwa, sawa', and siwa are always in the accusative case as adverbs of time or place, even if they are in the position of the subject, correct?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: Sibawayhi's statement [Ar-Ra'd 13:10].
The Shaykh : No, this is not an exception.
The student: On sawa'.
The Shaykh : It is not an exception; this is not an exception by consensus, like:[Al-Munafiqun 63:6] This is clear. But if it comes in the way of an exception, meaning "except," if it becomes the meaning of "except," whereas if it comes as a subject or something similar, that is known.
The student: But you said it must be an adverb of time or place if it is an exception.
The Shaykh : In the state of exception, if it means "except," yes. He said: "and excepted".
The student: Sibawayhi's statement regarding suwa, suwa, and sawa'?
The Shaykh : It is in the accusative case as an adverb of time or place always, and what comes contrary to that is interpreted.
The student: Is it tanweened or not?
The Shaykh : It is tanweened, it is tanweened, because it is like huda, because the alif is not for the feminine. He said: "and excepted, making it accusative with laysa and khala"
It appears we stop here.
The student: But this verse.
The Shaykh : Ah, no, but two hours.
It is the same [to Him] concerning you whether one conceals [his] speech or one publicizes it
سَوَاءٌ مِنْكُمْ مَنْ أَسَرَّ الْقَوْلَ وَمَنْ جَهَرَ بِهِThe Shaykh : No, this is not an exception.
The student: On sawa'.
The Shaykh : It is not an exception; this is not an exception by consensus, like:
It is all the same for them whether you ask forgiveness for them or do not ask forgiveness for them
سَوَاءٌ عَلَيْهِمْ أَسْتَغْفَرْتَ لَهُمْ أَمْ لَمْ تَسْتَغْفِرْ لَهُمْThe student: But you said it must be an adverb of time or place if it is an exception.
The Shaykh : In the state of exception, if it means "except," yes. He said: "and excepted".
The student: Sibawayhi's statement regarding suwa, suwa, and sawa'?
The Shaykh : It is in the accusative case as an adverb of time or place always, and what comes contrary to that is interpreted.
The student: Is it tanweened or not?
The Shaykh : It is tanweened, it is tanweened, because it is like huda, because the alif is not for the feminine. He said: "and excepted, making it accusative with laysa and khala"
It appears we stop here.
The student: But this verse.
The Shaykh : Ah, no, but two hours.