Discussion of the previously stated point that the *hal* (circumstantial phrase) does not originate from the *mudaf ilayh* (the word to which it is attached) except under three conditions.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes, in the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and may peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and all his Companions.
It was previously stated that it is not permissible for the *hal* (circumstantial phrase) to originate from the *mudaf ilayh* (the word to which it is attached) except under three conditions: when the *mudaf* (the word doing the attaching) requires its action, or when it is a part of what it is attached to, or when it is like a part of it only. However, Sibawayhi (may Allah have mercy on him) held the view that it is permissible for the *hal* to originate from the *mudaf ilayh* absolutely, whenever the speech is correct. This opinion is the stronger one. This opinion is the stronger one based on the well-known principle among us, which is that we take the easier path in the chapter of grammar, because there is no evidence for prohibition. If the *hal* originates from the *mudaf ilayh* in these three cases, what prevents it in other cases? Therefore, the correct view is that the *hal* originates from the *mudaf ilayh*, yes, whether it is in the three cases mentioned by Ibn Malik or not, but on the condition that the meaning is coherent. The coherence of the meaning is necessary.
It was previously stated that it is not permissible for the *hal* (circumstantial phrase) to originate from the *mudaf ilayh* (the word to which it is attached) except under three conditions: when the *mudaf* (the word doing the attaching) requires its action, or when it is a part of what it is attached to, or when it is like a part of it only. However, Sibawayhi (may Allah have mercy on him) held the view that it is permissible for the *hal* to originate from the *mudaf ilayh* absolutely, whenever the speech is correct. This opinion is the stronger one. This opinion is the stronger one based on the well-known principle among us, which is that we take the easier path in the chapter of grammar, because there is no evidence for prohibition. If the *hal* originates from the *mudaf ilayh* in these three cases, what prevents it in other cases? Therefore, the correct view is that the *hal* originates from the *mudaf ilayh*, yes, whether it is in the three cases mentioned by Ibn Malik or not, but on the condition that the meaning is coherent. The coherence of the meaning is necessary.