Discussion of what was previously taken in the chapter on *la* for negating the genus.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : What is the condition for *la* to have the function of *inna*?
The student: That its noun and its predicate be indefinite.
The Shaykh : That its noun and its predicate be two indefinites. Cite from Ibn Malik’s words what you are saying?
The student: "Make *la* function like *inna* in the indefinite ***"
The Shaykh : In the indefinite, and he stated it generally, so this implies that its noun and its predicate must be two indefinites. The second condition.
The student: The second condition.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes, cite from Ibn Malik’s words for that.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Where is it found?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Transmitted, the singular is joined with an open case, which implies that its noun must necessarily follow it. Well, if there is no compound with separation, no compound with separation. The third, Muhammad.
The student: The third condition.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: The order between the noun and the predicate.
The Shaykh : The order between the noun and the predicate. Cite from Ibn Malik’s words for that.
The student: "*** After that, mention the predicate with the nominative case"
The Shaykh :"*** After that, mention the predicate with the nominative case" Well, how does it function?
The student: It functions like *inna*.
The Shaykh : Well, but how? Is it like *inna*, meaning if you say in *inna* "Zayd is standing," do you say "There is no Zayd standing" and what else?
The student: It is built.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Built.
The Shaykh : Meaning it differs from *inna* in the manner of functioning.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : What do you say? Does it differ from *inna* in the manner of functioning or not?
The student: No.
Another student: If its noun is singular... or compounded... then it is built...
The Shaykh : The important thing is, does it differ from *inna* in the manner of functioning or not?
The student: It differs in some ways and does not differ in some ways.
The Shaykh : Say yes or no only.
The student: Yes and no.
The Shaykh : No, "yes and no" is a contradiction, 'Abd.
The student: Yes, it differs.
The Shaykh : It differs because *inna* functions with indefinites and non-indefinites, but this may be taken from the explanation. Also, with *inna*, it is not permissible for its noun to be built; its noun is in the accusative case, not built, unlike this one.
Well, we say, what is meant by his saying "compounded"? Yes, "Singular, whether it came once or repeated"?
The student: ... Like "There is no power and no strength except by Allah."
The Shaykh : Yes, meaning whether it is mentioned once or twice or more.
What is meant by the compounded present participle? Muhammad.
The student: It is what... the compounded and what is attached to it.
The Shaykh : nothing
The student: ... the meaning.
The Shaykh : What is attached to it is part of the completion of its meaning. Well, well done. An example of the compounded.
The student: I
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: There is no boy of Zayd in the house.
The Shaykh : There is no boy of Zayd in the house. Is the example suitable?
The student: There is no boy of Zayd.
The Shaykh : It is suitable.
The student: There is no boy of Zayd standing.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: It is not suitable.
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: Because it is compounded to a definite noun.
The Shaykh : Compounded to a definite noun, and the one compounded to a definite noun.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : But this does not function at all, because the one compounded to a definite noun is definite, or not? So, "There is no boy of a man."
The student: There is no boy of a man standing.
The Shaykh : Well, "There is no boy of a man standing," the one resembling the compounded or the one similar to the compounded. 'Abd, we need one resembling the compounded because it is an object.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, Waleed.
The student: There is no one climbing a mountain or there is no one reading a book.
The Shaykh : Yes, where is the predicate?
The student: The predicate is "climbing."
The Shaykh : "Climbing" is its noun. "There is no one climbing a mountain."
The student: Present.
The Shaykh : Found, Zayn. We need one similar to the compounded with a nominative attached to it.
The student: There is no one whose action is ugly, [he is] praised.
The Shaykh : There is no one whose action is ugly, [he is] praised. Correct.
Well, they also mentioned a third thing that is similar to the compounded.
The student: Conjunction.
The Shaykh : Conjunction.
The student: If we name a person thirty-three, we say "There is no thirty-three present."
The Shaykh : Complete. Well, if you repeat, O Mansur, if you repeat *la*, how many cases are permissible in the first one?
The student: Two cases.
The Shaykh : Two cases, they are.
The student: Building and accusative.
The Shaykh : Building and accusative.
The student: Building and nominative.
The Shaykh : Building and nominative.
The student: Three, building.
The Shaykh : Three, building.
The student: And accusative and nominative.
The Shaykh : And accusative and nominative. How many cases are permissible in the first one if it is repeated?
The student: In the first one.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Or three cases.
The student: That its noun and its predicate be indefinite.
The Shaykh : That its noun and its predicate be two indefinites. Cite from Ibn Malik’s words what you are saying?
The student: "Make *la* function like *inna* in the indefinite ***"
The Shaykh : In the indefinite, and he stated it generally, so this implies that its noun and its predicate must be two indefinites. The second condition.
The student: The second condition.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes, cite from Ibn Malik’s words for that.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Where is it found?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Transmitted, the singular is joined with an open case, which implies that its noun must necessarily follow it. Well, if there is no compound with separation, no compound with separation. The third, Muhammad.
The student: The third condition.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: The order between the noun and the predicate.
The Shaykh : The order between the noun and the predicate. Cite from Ibn Malik’s words for that.
The student: "*** After that, mention the predicate with the nominative case"
The Shaykh :"*** After that, mention the predicate with the nominative case" Well, how does it function?
The student: It functions like *inna*.
The Shaykh : Well, but how? Is it like *inna*, meaning if you say in *inna* "Zayd is standing," do you say "There is no Zayd standing" and what else?
The student: It is built.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: Built.
The Shaykh : Meaning it differs from *inna* in the manner of functioning.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : What do you say? Does it differ from *inna* in the manner of functioning or not?
The student: No.
Another student: If its noun is singular... or compounded... then it is built...
The Shaykh : The important thing is, does it differ from *inna* in the manner of functioning or not?
The student: It differs in some ways and does not differ in some ways.
The Shaykh : Say yes or no only.
The student: Yes and no.
The Shaykh : No, "yes and no" is a contradiction, 'Abd.
The student: Yes, it differs.
The Shaykh : It differs because *inna* functions with indefinites and non-indefinites, but this may be taken from the explanation. Also, with *inna*, it is not permissible for its noun to be built; its noun is in the accusative case, not built, unlike this one.
Well, we say, what is meant by his saying "compounded"? Yes, "Singular, whether it came once or repeated"?
The student: ... Like "There is no power and no strength except by Allah."
The Shaykh : Yes, meaning whether it is mentioned once or twice or more.
What is meant by the compounded present participle? Muhammad.
The student: It is what... the compounded and what is attached to it.
The Shaykh : nothing
The student: ... the meaning.
The Shaykh : What is attached to it is part of the completion of its meaning. Well, well done. An example of the compounded.
The student: I
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: There is no boy of Zayd in the house.
The Shaykh : There is no boy of Zayd in the house. Is the example suitable?
The student: There is no boy of Zayd.
The Shaykh : It is suitable.
The student: There is no boy of Zayd standing.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: It is not suitable.
The Shaykh : Why?
The student: Because it is compounded to a definite noun.
The Shaykh : Compounded to a definite noun, and the one compounded to a definite noun.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : But this does not function at all, because the one compounded to a definite noun is definite, or not? So, "There is no boy of a man."
The student: There is no boy of a man standing.
The Shaykh : Well, "There is no boy of a man standing," the one resembling the compounded or the one similar to the compounded. 'Abd, we need one resembling the compounded because it is an object.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, Waleed.
The student: There is no one climbing a mountain or there is no one reading a book.
The Shaykh : Yes, where is the predicate?
The student: The predicate is "climbing."
The Shaykh : "Climbing" is its noun. "There is no one climbing a mountain."
The student: Present.
The Shaykh : Found, Zayn. We need one similar to the compounded with a nominative attached to it.
The student: There is no one whose action is ugly, [he is] praised.
The Shaykh : There is no one whose action is ugly, [he is] praised. Correct.
Well, they also mentioned a third thing that is similar to the compounded.
The student: Conjunction.
The Shaykh : Conjunction.
The student: If we name a person thirty-three, we say "There is no thirty-three present."
The Shaykh : Complete. Well, if you repeat, O Mansur, if you repeat *la*, how many cases are permissible in the first one?
The student: Two cases.
The Shaykh : Two cases, they are.
The student: Building and accusative.
The Shaykh : Building and accusative.
The student: Building and nominative.
The Shaykh : Building and nominative.
The student: Three, building.
The Shaykh : Three, building.
The student: And accusative and nominative.
The Shaykh : And accusative and nominative. How many cases are permissible in the first one if it is repeated?
The student: In the first one.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Or three cases.