His statement in the hadith regarding cleaning with stones: (It is *ruks*), does this apply to every dung, or only the one Abu Hurayrah brought, and is the intended meaning that it is rejected?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Shaykh, in his statement , does he mean every dung, or the one Abu Hurayrah brought?
The Shaykh : The one he brought is impure; it is donkey dung, and donkey dung is impure.
The questioner : O Shaykh, when he said it with mention, does he mean it is defiled?
The Shaykh : It is not correct.
The questioner : His saying, Exalted is He:.
The Shaykh : It is in the correct version, and for this reason they said: if it were so, he would have said *ruks*, which is the verbal noun of *ruks*. So, we say that we derive the ruling for dung from what we derived for bones, and we attribute the cause to it as we attributed the cause to bones.
It is *rajis*
إنها رجسThe Shaykh : The one he brought is impure; it is donkey dung, and donkey dung is impure.
The questioner : O Shaykh, when he said it with mention, does he mean it is defiled?
The Shaykh : It is not correct.
The questioner : His saying, Exalted is He:
And they defiled it
واركسوا فيهاThe Shaykh : It is in the correct version, and for this reason they said: if it were so, he would have said *ruks*, which is the verbal noun of *ruks*. So, we say that we derive the ruling for dung from what we derived for bones, and we attribute the cause to it as we attributed the cause to bones.