A man gathered with a group to discuss his situation with his wife, but he felt distressed by them and by her, and said
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : He disclosed his situation to people, and the narrative is presented from the wife's side only, to show that she is in the right and that her husband is unjust to her. If the husband happened to tell her family what occurred, they are accustomed to not believing anything he says, because they see him as contrary to the traditions and customs of people. There was distress, anger, and embarrassment for the husband from this matter, involving lying to him. One day, a disagreement occurred between the wife and the husband, and when the wife's father came to reconcile them and gathered the relatives for this matter, such gatherings had taken place before for reconciliation more than once. Each time, the husband agreed to what they decided in some matters, hoping that the wife would improve, and also for the sake of their children so that they would not be neglected. In such a gathering, when the father sits, he explains that the husband, for example, does not allow his wife to leave the house, or does not allow her to go to wedding parties where there is free mixing, or does not want her to buy dresses and wants her to wear the jilbab. From this perspective, the husband realized that these gatherings were of no use, so he said, while in a state of anger, distress, and embarrassment, that the matter was over for him, meaning divorce. However, they did not understand what he intended or meant. Despite this, he did not utter the formula of divorce to the wife or anyone else. After that, whenever the husband was asked about his situation and his wife, he said that the matter was over for him and he did not want to go back to the wife, based on his initial assumption, that is, what he had told her father while in that state of distress, embarrassment, and anger. Does this count as a divorce that takes effect or not?
The Shaykh : Has there been a divorce before?
The questioner : Yes?
The Shaykh : Has there been a divorce before?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : How many divorces?
The questioner : Two divorces.
The Shaykh : And this is the third?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Ask someone else.
The questioner : Yes?
The Shaykh : Ask someone else.
The questioner : Good, if Allah wills.
The Shaykh : May Allah will good.
The questioner : Shaykh AliAl-Halabi : He says that the one who borrows salt from the shop, meaning he buys it on credit, that it is forbidden?
The Shaykh : Ask Ali.
The questioner : Yes?
The Shaykh : Ask Ali.
The questioner : What is your opinion, Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Ask me.
The Shaykh : Has there been a divorce before?
The questioner : Yes?
The Shaykh : Has there been a divorce before?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : How many divorces?
The questioner : Two divorces.
The Shaykh : And this is the third?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Ask someone else.
The questioner : Yes?
The Shaykh : Ask someone else.
The questioner : Good, if Allah wills.
The Shaykh : May Allah will good.
The questioner : Shaykh AliAl-Halabi : He says that the one who borrows salt from the shop, meaning he buys it on credit, that it is forbidden?
The Shaykh : Ask Ali.
The questioner : Yes?
The Shaykh : Ask Ali.
The questioner : What is your opinion, Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Ask me.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
