What is the validity of the statement that the disagreement among jurists is a difference of variety?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
I read an article stating that all the disagreement that occurred among the jurists is a difference of variety. Is this statement correct?
Answer:
It may be correct from one perspective, and not correct from another; because rulings may differ, and if the rulings differ, it becomes a difference of variety. However, the rulings may not differ and remain the same, but the attributes may differ.
Q: So it is divided into two categories: a difference of variety and a difference of contradiction?
The Shaykh: It may be a difference of variety, and it may be a difference of contradiction, yes.
I read an article stating that all the disagreement that occurred among the jurists is a difference of variety. Is this statement correct?
Answer:
It may be correct from one perspective, and not correct from another; because rulings may differ, and if the rulings differ, it becomes a difference of variety. However, the rulings may not differ and remain the same, but the attributes may differ.
Q: So it is divided into two categories: a difference of variety and a difference of contradiction?
The Shaykh: It may be a difference of variety, and it may be a difference of contradiction, yes.
Source
binbaz.org.sa
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.