Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

We mentioned that disagreement is a reason for not carrying out the hudud (fixed Qur'anic punishments) because it constitutes a shubhah (a doubtful matter), but we also said that the reasoning based on disagreement is defective. How is that?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : We mentioned that disagreement is a reason for not carrying out the hudud (fixed Qur'anic punishments).

The Shaykh : Because disagreement is a shubhah (a doubtful matter). I tell you, because disagreement is a shubhah (a doubtful matter).

The questioner : Yes, and the principle states that reasoning based on disagreement is defective. So how is it?

The Shaykh : No, no, my brother, reasoning based on disagreement applies to establishing rulings, not to lifting punishments. That is, sometimes we say that something is disliked (makruh) in order to avoid disagreement.

The questioner : ... .

The Shaykh : No, no, because this is the application of a punishment. As long as the scholars differ on this matter, they consider it a shubhah (a doubtful matter). We are not now reasoning for the obligation of something or establishing a ruling, but rather we are dropping a punishment because we have not verified that it is established or that its basis is established.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas