Why is "existing" implied in the prepositional phrase and the adverb of time or place?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : We said that in the case of the verb, the doer, the subject, and the predicate, the predicate is the predicate of the first subject; the sentence is the predicate of the first subject.
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : Whereas we said that the prepositional phrase is attached to the predicate, which is attached to "existing," and that is the predicate of the first subject.
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : Why do we not make the prepositional phrase itself the predicate?
The Shaykh : According to the author's opinion, it is the predicate.
The questioner : Yes, but according to the opinion of the Basrans, why did they imply it?
The Shaykh : Ah, he says because the prepositional phrase, the prepositional phrase must have an attachment, and the adverb of time or place must have an attachment.
The questioner : The Shaykh ...
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : We said that in the case of the verb, the doer, the subject, and the predicate, the predicate is the predicate of the first subject; the sentence is the predicate of the first subject.
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : Whereas we said that the prepositional phrase is attached to the predicate, which is attached to "existing," and that is the predicate of the first subject.
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : Why do we not make the prepositional phrase itself the predicate?
The Shaykh : According to the author's opinion, it is the predicate.
The questioner : Yes, but according to the opinion of the Basrans, why did they imply it?
The Shaykh : Ah, he says because the prepositional phrase, the prepositional phrase must have an attachment, and the adverb of time or place must have an attachment.
The questioner : The Shaykh ...
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.