regarding Ibn Malik's statement, "Your father's brother came, in a state of elevation"

The Shaykh : Yes.

The questioner : The grammatical analysis of "dha" ...

The Shaykh : Yes.

The questioner : Yesterday, as a state (hal), meaning.

The Shaykh : What?

The questioner : I mean, if the state (hal) were singular, it is not necessary for it to be a derived form.

The Shaykh : Which one?

The questioner :"Your father's brother came, in a state of elevation".

The Shaykh : Yes, "la" here means "possessor"; this means it is a derived form because it means "possessor."

The questioner : Well, what would be the case if the one who came was in the state of being, meaning, how do we make it from his father?

The Shaykh : Yes, exactly.

The questioner : The coming is originally for the brother.

The Shaykh : Your father's brother came.

The questioner : The one who came is the brother.

The Shaykh : Yes.

The questioner : So how is the state of being described as another person, his father?

The Shaykh : Perhaps your father's brother, who is described as elevated, is your father's brother.

The questioner : It is not a state (hal); I mean the state (hal).

The Shaykh : The state (hal), the state (hal); every state (hal) is a description in meaning. Recite it, or shall I read it?

The questioner : In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.