What is the authenticity of the hadith (I saw my Lord in the best form) and its jurisprudential understanding?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Shaykh, is the hadith: Sunan ad-Darimi 10:14 authentic?
The Shaykh : .
The questioner : .
The Shaykh : Yes, it is authentic, despite the nose of this wicked al-Suqaf.
The questioner : How do we understand it?
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner : How do we understand it?
The Shaykh : It is a dream vision.
The questioner : Meaning, we do not attribute a form to Allah from it.
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : A form is not attributed to Allah from it.
The Shaykh : No, it is the form of Allah, a reality that exists in Him - Blessed and Exalted is He - and the hadith of the form regarding the gathering place is an authentic hadith, but this specific hadith is a dream vision.
The questioner : Is there no contradiction between your statement and your statement regarding the hadiths?
The Shaykh : What do the jurists say? Leave it. What do the jurists say?
The questioner : In the hadith of the form, the struck servant, the pronoun refers to ... .
The Shaykh : To Adam.
The questioner : To Adam.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Meaning, one does not combine this and also use it as evidence for affirming the form with this hadith.
The Shaykh : After returning the pronoun to Adam, or before?
The questioner : No, to Allah - Blessed and Exalted is He.
The Shaykh : This is an error.
The questioner : If I return the pronoun to Allah.
The Shaykh : Do not say "if," for "if" opens the door to Satan.
The questioner : I say, according to the statement of those who say ...
The Shaykh : Then direct the question to them.
Yes.
I saw my Lord
رأيت ربِّي في أحسن صورةThe Shaykh :
I saw my Lord
رأيت ربِّيThe questioner :
in the best form
في أحسن صورةThe Shaykh : Yes, it is authentic, despite the nose of this wicked al-Suqaf.
The questioner : How do we understand it?
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner : How do we understand it?
The Shaykh : It is a dream vision.
The questioner : Meaning, we do not attribute a form to Allah from it.
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : A form is not attributed to Allah from it.
The Shaykh : No, it is the form of Allah, a reality that exists in Him - Blessed and Exalted is He - and the hadith of the form regarding the gathering place is an authentic hadith, but this specific hadith is a dream vision.
The questioner : Is there no contradiction between your statement and your statement regarding the hadiths?
The Shaykh : What do the jurists say? Leave it. What do the jurists say?
The questioner : In the hadith of the form, the struck servant, the pronoun refers to ... .
The Shaykh : To Adam.
The questioner : To Adam.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Meaning, one does not combine this and also use it as evidence for affirming the form with this hadith.
The Shaykh : After returning the pronoun to Adam, or before?
The questioner : No, to Allah - Blessed and Exalted is He.
The Shaykh : This is an error.
The questioner : If I return the pronoun to Allah.
The Shaykh : Do not say "if," for "if" opens the door to Satan.
The questioner : I say, according to the statement of those who say ...
The Shaykh : Then direct the question to them.
Yes.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.