Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "In inflection, the following names follow the first *** the adjective, the emphatic, the conjoined, and the substitute."

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The author said: "In inflection, the following names follow the first":
The word "al-asma" (names): Is its second hamza a hamzat al-qat' (severed hamza) or not? "Al-asma" has a hamzat al-qat'.
The student: And its original form! ?

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: And the original form is that it is connected (hamzat al-wasl).

The Shaykh : No, no, it is a hamzat al-qat'; its second hamza is a hamzat al-qat'.
They are not but [mere] names you have named إنْ هي إلا أسماء سميتموها
[An-Najm 53:23]
: So it is on the pattern of "af'al" (plural of action), but here you make it a hamzat al-wasl. Why? For the necessity of poetry, so you say: "It follows in al-asma, in al-asma, in inflection: al-asma."
"The first":
What is the grammatical position of "al-asma" (names)? Its position is accusative, as it is a fronted object. Its position is accusative, as it is a fronted object, and it is an adjective: this is the subject of "follows"; it is the subject: an adjective follows it.
"And the emphatic, the conjoined, and the substitute":
So the followers (tabi'at) are four: the adjective, the emphatic, the conjoined, and the substitute. So the followers are four, gathered in one hemistich of Ibn Malik's Alfiyyah:
"The adjective, the emphatic, the conjoined, and the substitute"
Yes, and all of them have definitions and rulings.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas