Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: " ... and as He, Mighty and Majestic, said:
And fear a Day when no soul will suffice for another soul at all واتقوا يوماً لا تجزي نفس عن نفسٍ شيئًا
[Al-Baqarah 2:48]
: meaning 'nothing is compensated for in it,' so 'in it' was omitted. There are two opinions regarding how it was omitted: the first is that it was omitted in its entirety all at once, and the second is that it was omitted gradually, so 'in' was omitted first, causing the pronoun to attach to the verb, becoming 'taji'uh, then this attached pronoun was omitted, becoming 'taji'."


The Shaykh : We have two ways of omitting it: was the preposition and its object omitted directly, 'nothing is compensated for in it,' or was the preposition omitted first, causing the pronoun to attach to the verb, and then the pronoun was omitted? Which is easier?
The student: All of them are easier.

The Shaykh : The first one, because here we are taking two steps, whereas in the first one it is only one step, so it is easier. But these scholars avoided the deletion of the preposition, as it has been established for us in the chapter on relative pronouns that prepositions are not deleted with their objects except under certain conditions. However, objects are always deleted frequently. But we say: since the matter is clear from the context, we say the preposition and its object were omitted together all at once, yes.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas