Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: " And with fa'alaal and its like, pronounce *** In the plural of what exceeds three, it ascended ".
The Shaykh : This is a form of the ultimate plural, fa'alaal.
The reader: " From what has passed, and from a five-letter word *** The last is stripped ".
The Shaykh : The nose is removed.
The reader: " The nose is removed by analogy
And the fourth, resembling the added, may *** Be deleted, unlike what completes the count
And the added letter of the ordinary four-letter word, delete it, if *** It is not a soft letter following it "
The Shaykh : Following it.
The reader: Which.
The Shaykh : Which closed it.
The reader: " Following it, which closed it ".
The Shaykh : Which means?
The student: Who.
The Shaykh : Which, yes.
The reader: " Examples of the plural of abundance are fa'alaal and its like, which is every plural whose third letter is an alif followed by two letters ".
The Shaykh : Zayn, this is the rule: " Every plural whose third letter is an alif followed by two letters, fa'alaal, fa'aa'il ", or not?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Okay, mafa'ala, is it like it?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, yes!
The reader: " Every non-derived four-letter noun is pluralized with fa'alaal ".
The student: Shaykh!
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: The active participle...
The Shaykh : It is not from the ultimate plurals, even fa'alaal is from the ultimate plurals.
The student: This is like fa'alaal, the active participle, is it as if it is derived?!
The Shaykh : Yes, it is derived, but the discussion is about the meter only, not about the principles, yes.
The reader: " Every non-derived four-letter noun is pluralized with fa'alaal, such as: Ja'far and Ja'afir, and Zubrij and Zubarij, and Burthun and Barathin ".
The Shaykh : Yes.
The reader: " And every derived four-letter noun is pluralized with its like, such as Juhur and Jawahir, and Surif and Sayarif, and Masjid and Masajid, and he specified by his phrase: from what has passed, the four-letter word whose plural was previously mentioned, such as Ahmar and Hamra, and the like of what was previously mentioned, and he indicated by his phrase: and from a five-letter word, the last is stripped by analogy: that the five-letter word stripped of addition is pluralized as fa'aa'il by analogy ".
The student: It is pluralized as fa'aa'il!
The Shaykh : As fa'aa'il.
The student: Yes, fa'aa'il.
The Shaykh : And he indicated by his phrase!!
The reader: And he indicated by his phrase: " And from a five-letter word, the last is stripped by analogy: that the five-letter word stripped of addition is pluralized as fa'aa'il by analogy ".
The student: It is pluralized as fa'aa'il.
The Shaykh : As fa'aa'il?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Let's see now, let's see, let him be patient, be patient, and it is deleted!
The reader: " And its fifth letter is deleted, such as Safarij and Safarjal ".
The Shaykh : Safarij in Safarjal.
The reader: " Safarij in Safarjal, and Farazd in Farzdaq, and Khawarn ".
The Shaykh : Khawarn.
The reader: " And Khawarn in Khurnaq, and he indicated by his phrase ".
The Shaykh : Is it clear?
The student: Say: It became fa'alaal!
The Shaykh : It became fa'alaal!
The reader: " And he indicated by his phrase: and the fourth, resembling the added ".
The Shaykh : The fourth.
The reader: " And the fourth, resembling the added: the verse, that it is permissible to delete the fourth letter of the five-letter word stripped of addition, and keep its fifth letter, if its fourth letter resembles the added letter, by being one of the letters of addition, like the nun of Khurnaq, or being from the point of articulation of the letters of addition, like the dal of Farzdaq, it is permissible to say: Khawariq and Faraziq, and the common is the first, which is: deleting the fifth and keeping the fourth, such as: Khawarn and Farazd, if the fourth letter does not resemble the added letter, it is not permissible to delete it, but it is necessary to delete the fifth letter, so you say in Safarjal: Safarij, and it is not permissible to say Safaral, and he indicated by his phrase: and the added letter of the ordinary four-letter word, the verse ".
The Shaykh : No, it is not the added letter of the ordinary four-letter word, because it is the added letter of the word exceeding four, ordinary means exceeding, it is not ordinary in the sense of custom, yes.
The reader: " That if the five-letter word has an added letter, that letter is deleted if it is not a letter of elongation before the last letter, so you say: in Sibtari Sibatir, and in ".
The Shaykh : Fadukhs.
The reader: " Fadukhs Fadakhs, and in Madharaj Dharaj ".
The student: Is it an Arabic language, oh Shaykh?
The Shaykh : What is it?
The student: Fadukhs?
The Shaykh : This appears to be the name of a thing...
The reader: " If the added letter is a letter of elongation before the last letter, it is not deleted, but the noun is pluralized as fa'aa'il, such as: Qirtas and Qirtas, and Qandil and Qandil, and Asfur and Asafir, and the sin and taa from Kamsatad ".
The Shaykh : Kamsatad.
The Shaykh : This is a form of the ultimate plural, fa'alaal.
The reader: " From what has passed, and from a five-letter word *** The last is stripped ".
The Shaykh : The nose is removed.
The reader: " The nose is removed by analogy
And the fourth, resembling the added, may *** Be deleted, unlike what completes the count
And the added letter of the ordinary four-letter word, delete it, if *** It is not a soft letter following it "
The Shaykh : Following it.
The reader: Which.
The Shaykh : Which closed it.
The reader: " Following it, which closed it ".
The Shaykh : Which means?
The student: Who.
The Shaykh : Which, yes.
The reader: " Examples of the plural of abundance are fa'alaal and its like, which is every plural whose third letter is an alif followed by two letters ".
The Shaykh : Zayn, this is the rule: " Every plural whose third letter is an alif followed by two letters, fa'alaal, fa'aa'il ", or not?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Okay, mafa'ala, is it like it?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes, yes!
The reader: " Every non-derived four-letter noun is pluralized with fa'alaal ".
The student: Shaykh!
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: The active participle...
The Shaykh : It is not from the ultimate plurals, even fa'alaal is from the ultimate plurals.
The student: This is like fa'alaal, the active participle, is it as if it is derived?!
The Shaykh : Yes, it is derived, but the discussion is about the meter only, not about the principles, yes.
The reader: " Every non-derived four-letter noun is pluralized with fa'alaal, such as: Ja'far and Ja'afir, and Zubrij and Zubarij, and Burthun and Barathin ".
The Shaykh : Yes.
The reader: " And every derived four-letter noun is pluralized with its like, such as Juhur and Jawahir, and Surif and Sayarif, and Masjid and Masajid, and he specified by his phrase: from what has passed, the four-letter word whose plural was previously mentioned, such as Ahmar and Hamra, and the like of what was previously mentioned, and he indicated by his phrase: and from a five-letter word, the last is stripped by analogy: that the five-letter word stripped of addition is pluralized as fa'aa'il by analogy ".
The student: It is pluralized as fa'aa'il!
The Shaykh : As fa'aa'il.
The student: Yes, fa'aa'il.
The Shaykh : And he indicated by his phrase!!
The reader: And he indicated by his phrase: " And from a five-letter word, the last is stripped by analogy: that the five-letter word stripped of addition is pluralized as fa'aa'il by analogy ".
The student: It is pluralized as fa'aa'il.
The Shaykh : As fa'aa'il?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Let's see now, let's see, let him be patient, be patient, and it is deleted!
The reader: " And its fifth letter is deleted, such as Safarij and Safarjal ".
The Shaykh : Safarij in Safarjal.
The reader: " Safarij in Safarjal, and Farazd in Farzdaq, and Khawarn ".
The Shaykh : Khawarn.
The reader: " And Khawarn in Khurnaq, and he indicated by his phrase ".
The Shaykh : Is it clear?
The student: Say: It became fa'alaal!
The Shaykh : It became fa'alaal!
The reader: " And he indicated by his phrase: and the fourth, resembling the added ".
The Shaykh : The fourth.
The reader: " And the fourth, resembling the added: the verse, that it is permissible to delete the fourth letter of the five-letter word stripped of addition, and keep its fifth letter, if its fourth letter resembles the added letter, by being one of the letters of addition, like the nun of Khurnaq, or being from the point of articulation of the letters of addition, like the dal of Farzdaq, it is permissible to say: Khawariq and Faraziq, and the common is the first, which is: deleting the fifth and keeping the fourth, such as: Khawarn and Farazd, if the fourth letter does not resemble the added letter, it is not permissible to delete it, but it is necessary to delete the fifth letter, so you say in Safarjal: Safarij, and it is not permissible to say Safaral, and he indicated by his phrase: and the added letter of the ordinary four-letter word, the verse ".
The Shaykh : No, it is not the added letter of the ordinary four-letter word, because it is the added letter of the word exceeding four, ordinary means exceeding, it is not ordinary in the sense of custom, yes.
The reader: " That if the five-letter word has an added letter, that letter is deleted if it is not a letter of elongation before the last letter, so you say: in Sibtari Sibatir, and in ".
The Shaykh : Fadukhs.
The reader: " Fadukhs Fadakhs, and in Madharaj Dharaj ".
The student: Is it an Arabic language, oh Shaykh?
The Shaykh : What is it?
The student: Fadukhs?
The Shaykh : This appears to be the name of a thing...
The reader: " If the added letter is a letter of elongation before the last letter, it is not deleted, but the noun is pluralized as fa'aa'il, such as: Qirtas and Qirtas, and Qandil and Qandil, and Asfur and Asafir, and the sin and taa from Kamsatad ".
The Shaykh : Kamsatad.