We said that the most likely view is that "al-rajul" (the man) is the one being addressed in our saying, "O such a man." Do we say it is in the accusative case with a hidden fathah?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : The most likely view is that "rajul" is the one being addressed, meaning.
The Shaykh : Yes, yes.
The questioner : Okay, do we say: it is in the accusative case with a hidden fathah, as was mentioned previously?
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : Meaning, "al-rajul" (the man).
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : It is a description of a described noun.
The Shaykh : No, because this "ay" is merely a relative particle, meaning it came for the sake of something else, unlike what was mentioned previously.
The questioner : Shaykh!
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : The grammatical case appears on the last letter of the word!
The Shaykh : It is built on the dammah in the position of the accusative case. It is built on the dammah in the position of the accusative case. So, if it is in the accusative case, it is conjoined to its position. And if it is in the nominative case, it is conjoined to its position, but with a hidden fathah on its end, the prevention of its appearance being due to following.
The questioner : But what did the fathah make apparent, O Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The questioner : On "al-ghulam" (the boy).
The Shaykh : If you do not make it appear, if you make it with a dammah, and it does not return. If it appears clearly, if you make "al-ghulam" in the accusative case, it is clear and there is no problem.
The Shaykh : Yes, yes.
The questioner : Okay, do we say: it is in the accusative case with a hidden fathah, as was mentioned previously?
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : Meaning, "al-rajul" (the man).
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : It is a description of a described noun.
The Shaykh : No, because this "ay" is merely a relative particle, meaning it came for the sake of something else, unlike what was mentioned previously.
The questioner : Shaykh!
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : The grammatical case appears on the last letter of the word!
The Shaykh : It is built on the dammah in the position of the accusative case. It is built on the dammah in the position of the accusative case. So, if it is in the accusative case, it is conjoined to its position. And if it is in the nominative case, it is conjoined to its position, but with a hidden fathah on its end, the prevention of its appearance being due to following.
The questioner : But what did the fathah make apparent, O Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The questioner : On "al-ghulam" (the boy).
The Shaykh : If you do not make it appear, if you make it with a dammah, and it does not return. If it appears clearly, if you make "al-ghulam" in the accusative case, it is clear and there is no problem.