Continuation of the explanation of the verse: And like Zayd, close and open from *** like A-Zayd ibn Sa'id, do not weaken.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : All right, we said: "Close and open", we have not parsed it yet. Its parsing with the dammah is clear.
"A-Zayd ibn Sa'id": The hamzah is a letter of calling, Zayd is the called, built on the dammah in the position of accusative, ibn Sa'id, what is it?
The student: An attribute.
The Shaykh : It is a description of Zayd, a description in the accusative case, and the sign of its accusative is a visible fathah at its end. They said: It is permissible to parse it as an independent called, but if you parse it as an independent called, only the nominative case is allowed in the first part, so you say: A-Zayd, O ibn Sa'id, do not weaken. But we want to parse it as a description of Zayd. If we build Zayd on the fathah and say: A-Zayd ibn Sa'id, how is the parsing? We say: The hamzah is a letter of calling, Zayd is the called, built on a dammah, a dammah implied at its end, prevented from appearing by its following its description. Did you understand?
It is prevented from appearing by its following its description, it is in the position of accusative. Memorize this parsing because it may be confusing for a person. We previously thought that Zayd is in the accusative case, and there is a saying that it is built and what follows it is on the fathah, and the word "ibn" is ignored. But the correct parsing is to say: Zayd is the called, built on a dammah implied at its end, prevented from appearing by its following its description, because it follows it with the fathah only. So its fathah is what? A fathah of parsing or a fathah of following?
The student: A fathah of following.
The Shaykh : A fathah of following, not of parsing. It says: "And the dammah, if not intended", to the end of it.
"A-Zayd ibn Sa'id": The hamzah is a letter of calling, Zayd is the called, built on the dammah in the position of accusative, ibn Sa'id, what is it?
The student: An attribute.
The Shaykh : It is a description of Zayd, a description in the accusative case, and the sign of its accusative is a visible fathah at its end. They said: It is permissible to parse it as an independent called, but if you parse it as an independent called, only the nominative case is allowed in the first part, so you say: A-Zayd, O ibn Sa'id, do not weaken. But we want to parse it as a description of Zayd. If we build Zayd on the fathah and say: A-Zayd ibn Sa'id, how is the parsing? We say: The hamzah is a letter of calling, Zayd is the called, built on a dammah, a dammah implied at its end, prevented from appearing by its following its description. Did you understand?
It is prevented from appearing by its following its description, it is in the position of accusative. Memorize this parsing because it may be confusing for a person. We previously thought that Zayd is in the accusative case, and there is a saying that it is built and what follows it is on the fathah, and the word "ibn" is ignored. But the correct parsing is to say: Zayd is the called, built on a dammah implied at its end, prevented from appearing by its following its description, because it follows it with the fathah only. So its fathah is what? A fathah of parsing or a fathah of following?
The student: A fathah of following.
The Shaykh : A fathah of following, not of parsing. It says: "And the dammah, if not intended", to the end of it.