Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): . . . . . .
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"And open the last of the emphasized"
The last object is fronted, and "open" is a command verb, meaning: open the last of the emphasized. He said "open," then he said: "like ibriza". In "ibriza," this alif is the light nūn of emphasis that has been converted into an alif, and it is originally light. The original form of "ibriza" is "ibrizn," so the light nūn was converted into an alif, and it was said "ibriza." From the example, it is understood that the nūn of emphasis must be connected to the verb, it must be connected to the verb both in form and in meaning. If it is not connected to it, then it is not built on the fathah, like the saying of Allah the Exalted: and like the saying of Allah the Exalted: . As for when the nūn is not connected to the verb, it is not built on the fathah, like the saying of Allah the Exalted: [Az-Zukhruf 43:87] . And for that reason he said: . What is the difference? Because in , the nūn of the verb touched it both in form and in meaning, whereas in , it did not touch it. Did it not touch it in form, or did it not touch it in meaning?
The student: In form.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: In form.
The Shaykh : No, it did not touch it in meaning. It touched it in form. In, the nūn is directly after the lām, the nūn is directly after the lām, but in terms of meaning it did not touch it, because there are things omitted between it and the verb. What is the omitted part in your saying: ?
The student: The one who performs it.
The last object is fronted, and "open" is a command verb, meaning: open the last of the emphasized. He said "open," then he said: "like ibriza". In "ibriza," this alif is the light nūn of emphasis that has been converted into an alif, and it is originally light. The original form of "ibriza" is "ibrizn," so the light nūn was converted into an alif, and it was said "ibriza." From the example, it is understood that the nūn of emphasis must be connected to the verb, it must be connected to the verb both in form and in meaning. If it is not connected to it, then it is not built on the fathah, like the saying of Allah the Exalted:
He will surely be cast
لينبذنّThey will surely say, "This is for me"
ليقولنّ هذا ليThey will surely say, "This is for me"
ليقولنّ هذا ليAnd if you asked them who created them, they would surely say
ولئن سألتهم من خلقهم ليقولُنَّThey will surely say
ليقولُنَّhe will surely say, this is for me
ليقولَنَّ هذا ليhe will surely say, this is for me
ليقولَنَّ هذا ليand they will surely say, "Allah"
وليقولُنَّ اللهThe student: In form.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: In form.
The Shaykh : No, it did not touch it in meaning. It touched it in form. In
they will surely say
ليقولُنَّThey will surely say
ليقولُنَّThe student: The one who performs it.