Explanation of the saying of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And restore, if you delete it in the pause, what *** was absent in the connection on its account"
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"And restore, if you delete it in the pause, what *** was absent in the connection on its account"
If you delete it, restore what was absent in the pause. Accordingly, when we pause, we restore the yaa and we restore the waw, and we say: "Ya Hind, so that you understand, Ya Hind, so that you understand" — lower your voices — and we say: "Ya qawm, so that you hear, so that you hear." Now, if someone asks: "What does it benefit us now that the verb is emphatic? Huh? ... Because when the lam that occurs in the answer to an oath comes, is it not obligatory to emphasize it? So if we do not find the noon, we know that there is a deletion, and that the noon was originally present for emphasis. Likewise, if it were not emphatic, the noon of the nominative case would have to appear, and we would say: 'Ya Hindu,' huh?
The student: "So that you will stand."
The Shaykh : "So that you will stand," and "Ya qawm, so that you will hear, so that you will hear." Since the noon of the nominative case did not come, and we found what intends emphasis, which is the lam that prepares for the oath, we knew that there is a noon of emphasis but it was deleted. And when it was deleted, it became obligatory to restore what was deleted on its account in the connection. Why? Because in the connection, the deletion is due to its presence, so if it is removed?
The student: "It returned."
The Shaykh : It returned, and for this reason he said:
"And restore, if you delete it in the pause, what *** was absent in the connection on its account"
If you delete it, restore what was absent in the pause. Accordingly, when we pause, we restore the yaa and we restore the waw, and we say: "Ya Hind, so that you understand, Ya Hind, so that you understand" — lower your voices — and we say: "Ya qawm, so that you hear, so that you hear." Now, if someone asks: "What does it benefit us now that the verb is emphatic? Huh? ... Because when the lam that occurs in the answer to an oath comes, is it not obligatory to emphasize it? So if we do not find the noon, we know that there is a deletion, and that the noon was originally present for emphasis. Likewise, if it were not emphatic, the noon of the nominative case would have to appear, and we would say: 'Ya Hindu,' huh?
The student: "So that you will stand."
The Shaykh : "So that you will stand," and "Ya qawm, so that you will hear, so that you will hear." Since the noon of the nominative case did not come, and we found what intends emphasis, which is the lam that prepares for the oath, we knew that there is a noon of emphasis but it was deleted. And when it was deleted, it became obligatory to restore what was deleted on its account in the connection. Why? Because in the connection, the deletion is due to its presence, so if it is removed?
The student: "It returned."
The Shaykh : It returned, and for this reason he said:
"And restore, if you delete it in the pause, what *** was absent in the connection on its account"