Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: " And the hamzah of a word with a long vowel that is used in the genitive *** is what has a corresponding form in the dual.
The ruling on the hamzah of a word with a long vowel in the genitive is the same as its ruling in the dual. If it is an extra letter for the feminine, it is changed to a waw, like *Himrawi* from *Himra'* (red), or if it is an extra letter for assimilation, like *'Alba'* (a type of bird), or if it is a substitute for an original letter, like *Kasa'* (a cloak) "
.
The student: ...

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: ...

The Shaykh : ... Yes?
The student: It is in the accusative case.

The Shaykh : In my opinion, it is in the accusative case ... Yes.
The reader: " Or if it is a substitute for an original letter, like *Kasa'* (a cloak), then there are two options: keeping it as a hamzah, like *'Albayi* and *Kasayi*, or changing it, like *'Albawi* and *Kasawi*. Or if it is an original letter, then keeping it as a hamzah is the only option, like *Qirayi* from *Qira'* (reading) ".

The Shaykh : Yes, my beginning form is in?
The student: Beginning.

The Shaykh : In the beginning, and my ending form is in?
The student: Ending.

The Shaykh : In the ending.
The student: ...

The Shaykh : My ending form.
The student: *Intihawi* because the hamzah has been changed.

The Shaykh : *Intihawi* because this hamzah has been changed. Yes.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas