Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: " And rule on the root letters of simsim *** and the like, and the exception in kalimlim
By simsim, the four-letter word is meant "
The Shaykh : By simsim, it is meant.
The reader: ...
The Shaykh : By samasam? No, no, by simsim.
The reader: " By simsim, the four-letter word is meant "
The Shaykh : And this also needs to be defined in practice. Can one of you define it? What is 'Abdullah here?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Simsim is this ..
The student: A small seed, O Shaykh, for eating birds.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is put in some bread sometimes ..
The student: ...
The Shaykh : The one that is put in some bread sometimes, this round bread, but anyway, we know it now, yes.
The reader: " By simsim, the four-letter word is meant in which its fa' and 'ayn are repeated, and neither of the repeated letters is eligible for omission. In this type, all its letters are ruled to be roots. If one of the repeated letters is eligible for omission, the ruling on it as an extra letter is a matter of disagreement. An example of this is lamlam "
The Shaykh : Lamlam.
The reader: " A command from lamlam, and kafkaf, a command from kafkaf. The second lam and the second kaf are eligible for omission, as evidenced by the validity of lam and kaf "
The Shaykh : Lam and kaf.
The reader: " Lam and kaf. People differed on this, and it was said: they are two roots, and that kafkaf is not from kaf, nor is lamlam from lam, so the lam and the kaf are not extra. It was also said: the lam is extra, and so is the kaf. And it was said: they are substitutes for a doubled letter, and the original form was lamm and kaff, then one of the doubled letters was substituted with a lam in lamlam and a kaf in kafkaf ".
The Shaykh : Good, what do you have to say? Give it to me, give me what you have ... yes.
By simsim, the four-letter word is meant "
The Shaykh : By simsim, it is meant.
The reader: ...
The Shaykh : By samasam? No, no, by simsim.
The reader: " By simsim, the four-letter word is meant "
The Shaykh : And this also needs to be defined in practice. Can one of you define it? What is 'Abdullah here?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Simsim is this ..
The student: A small seed, O Shaykh, for eating birds.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is put in some bread sometimes ..
The student: ...
The Shaykh : The one that is put in some bread sometimes, this round bread, but anyway, we know it now, yes.
The reader: " By simsim, the four-letter word is meant in which its fa' and 'ayn are repeated, and neither of the repeated letters is eligible for omission. In this type, all its letters are ruled to be roots. If one of the repeated letters is eligible for omission, the ruling on it as an extra letter is a matter of disagreement. An example of this is lamlam "
The Shaykh : Lamlam.
The reader: " A command from lamlam, and kafkaf, a command from kafkaf. The second lam and the second kaf are eligible for omission, as evidenced by the validity of lam and kaf "
The Shaykh : Lam and kaf.
The reader: " Lam and kaf. People differed on this, and it was said: they are two roots, and that kafkaf is not from kaf, nor is lamlam from lam, so the lam and the kaf are not extra. It was also said: the lam is extra, and so is the kaf. And it was said: they are substitutes for a doubled letter, and the original form was lamm and kaff, then one of the doubled letters was substituted with a lam in lamlam and a kaf in kafkaf ".
The Shaykh : Good, what do you have to say? Give it to me, give me what you have ... yes.