The ruling on one who finds his sacrificial animal slaughtered and taken after returning from stoning the Jamarat al-Aqabah, and then slaughters another
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The ruling on one who finds his sacrificial animal slaughtered and taken after returning from stoning the Jamarat al-Aqabah, and then slaughters another
The questioner: A man had his sacrificial animal in his car, so he went to stone the Jamrat al-Aqabah, and when he returned, he found his sacrificial animal had been slaughtered and taken?The Shaykh: Slaughtered?The questioner: Yes, and it was taken after it was slaughtered, because he found its head and intestines, so he slaughtered another in its place. Is this action of his valid?The Shaykh: Yes, it suffices for him, because he designated it as his sacrificial animal, so he slaughtered it after the designation. And the slaughter by the usurper, according to the stronger opinion, makes the slaughtered animal lawful. Accordingly, his purchasing a sacrificial animal after that is on the basis of voluntary charity, and may Allah reward him with good.Meaning: If the sacrificial animal had not been slaughtered with his blood, it would suffice for him because it was slaughtered. But if it was taken and he does not know whether it was slaughtered or not, he must slaughter one in its place.
The questioner: A man had his sacrificial animal in his car, so he went to stone the Jamrat al-Aqabah, and when he returned, he found his sacrificial animal had been slaughtered and taken?The Shaykh: Slaughtered?The questioner: Yes, and it was taken after it was slaughtered, because he found its head and intestines, so he slaughtered another in its place. Is this action of his valid?The Shaykh: Yes, it suffices for him, because he designated it as his sacrificial animal, so he slaughtered it after the designation. And the slaughter by the usurper, according to the stronger opinion, makes the slaughtered animal lawful. Accordingly, his purchasing a sacrificial animal after that is on the basis of voluntary charity, and may Allah reward him with good.Meaning: If the sacrificial animal had not been slaughtered with his blood, it would suffice for him because it was slaughtered. But if it was taken and he does not know whether it was slaughtered or not, he must slaughter one in its place.