Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

How do we reconcile Allah’s saying: “And upon those who are able to do it is a ransom of feeding a poor person,” with His saying:

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : How do we reconcile Allah’s saying:
And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person وَعَلَى الَّذِينَ يُطِيقُونَهُ فِدْيَةٌ طَعَامُ مِسْكِينٍ
[Al-Baqarah 2:184]
with the other verse:
So whoever sights [the new moon of] the month, let him fast it فَمَنْ شَهِدَ مِنْكُمُ الشَّهْرَ فَلْيَصُمْهُ
[Al-Baqarah 2:185]
? He asks: Is the narration from Ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) regarding the reading:
And upon those who are not able to do it is a ransom of feeding a poor person وعلى الذين لا يُطيقونه فدية طعام مسكين
authentic?

The Shaykh : Yes, we reconcile the two verses the questioner referred to, which are Allah’s saying:
And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person وَعَلَى الَّذِينَ يُطِيقُونَهُ فِدْيَةٌ طَعَامُ مِسْكِينٍ
[Al-Baqarah 2:184]
and His saying:
So whoever sights [the new moon of] the month, let him fast it فَمَنْ شَهِدَ مِنْكُمُ الشَّهْرَ فَلْيَصُمْهُ
[Al-Baqarah 2:185]
, by stating that the first verse was abrogated by the second, as established in the authentic hadith from Salama ibn al-Akwa‘ that when fasting was first made obligatory, a person was given the choice between fasting and paying the ransom. Then Allah the Exalted made fasting an individual obligation, and the ransom remained for those who cannot fast on a continuous basis. Thus, one who is unable to fast due to a permanent inability, such as an elderly person or a sick person whose recovery is not expected, owes a ransom of feeding a poor person in place of the fast.
As for the reading of Ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him and him) that the questioner referred to:
And upon those who are not able to do it is a ransom of feeding a poor person وعلى الذين لا يطيقونه فدية طعام مسكين
, I do not know this from Ibn ‘Abbas, but it is the opinion of some of the later scholars. Interpreting the verse with this is a very weak interpretation, because it entails interpreting an affirmed thing with a negated thing, which is the opposite of interpretation entirely. What came from Ibn ‘Abbas regarding the noble verse:
And upon those who are able [to fast, but with hardship] - a ransom [as substitute] of feeding a poor person وعلى الذين يُطَوَّقُونه فدية طعام مسكين
[Al-Baqarah 2:184]
is that it means they reach their capacity and it becomes difficult for them. However, the correct interpretation of the verse is what we mentioned first, due to the authenticity of the hadith supporting it, which is that when fasting was first made obligatory, a person was given the choice between paying the ransom and fasting. This is indicated by Allah’s saying:
And whoever volunteers excess - it is better for him. But to fast is best for you فَمَنْ تَطَوَّعَ خَيْرًا فَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَهُ وَأَنْ تَصُومُوا خَيْرٌ لَكُمْ
[Al-Baqarah 2:184]
, which is evidence that the verse was revealed regarding those who are able to fast, so they are given the choice between fasting and paying the ransom, and then fasting became obligatory thereafter.
In summary of what has preceded, there are three interpretations of the noble verse. The first interpretation is that it refers to those who are able to fast, so they may fast or pay the ransom, but fasting is better for them. This opinion and this interpretation is the correct one, due to the indication of the authentic hadith.
The second interpretation is that the meaning of the verse:
And upon those who are burdened with it وعلى الذين يطوَّقونه
is that they reach their capacity and it becomes difficult for them. This interpretation is narrated from ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him and him).
The third interpretation is that the meaning of the verse is:
And upon those who are not able to do it is a ransom of feeding a poor person وعلى الذين لا يطيقونه فدية طعام مسكين
. This interpretation was stated by some of the later scholars, and it is a weak interpretation that does not align with the interpretation of the Qur'an. The first interpretation is the correct one due to the establishment of the hadith supporting it. Yes.

The questioner : The listener Sultan ‘Abdullah al-Muwaish from Riyadh asks: O Shaykh Muhammad.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas